jump to navigation

Voris loves my blog August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Dallas Diocese, General Catholic, scandals.
comments closed

He really does.  Watch:

I know exactly what he is talking about.  Various “orthodox, faithful” Catholic media outlets, local ones, refused to cover Sr. Rupp coming to Seton, or Gaillardetz at St. Mark, or Seton’s ties with Alinsky groups, or any of many other topics, because they did not want to lose the support of the bishop.  There are many stories I could tell.  And don’t even get me started what happens when concerned, involved Catholics point out some abuse or dissent occurring in the local churches – it’s like a black hole, words, letters, e-mails, faxes, etc., go in, nothing ever comes out.

Planned Parenthood corporate sponsors August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, General Catholic, sickness, Society.
comments closed

I found this handy list of corporate sponsors of Planned Parenthood.  It’s amazing how common and insidious this is.  We’re going to have to make some changes.  Like a new bank:

AOL, Darden Restaurants (Bahama Breeze, The Capital Grille, LongHorn Steakhouse, Olive Garden, Red Lobster, Season 52), Franchise Services (PIP, Signal Graphics, Sir Speedy), Hilton Worldwide (Conrad Hotels, Doubletree, Embassy Suites, Hampton Inns/Suites, Hilton Garden Inn, Hilton Hotels, Homewood Suites), Ignite Restaurants (Brickhouse Tavern+Tap, Joe’s Crab Shack), ING (financial services), Kohl’s (department stores), Mrs. Fields (cookies), Staples (office/school supplies), Toys “R” Us, and Trader Joe’s (markets/supermarkets).

More

AlphaGraphics, Wells Fargo (including Wachovia), Nike, Time Warner, Bank of America, Walt Disney, Johnson & Johnson, Lost Arrow (Patagonia, etc.), Chevron, and Nationwide Insurance, among others.

And charities that give money to Planned Parenthood, ’cause nothing says ‘charity’  like killing babies!

American Cancer Society, Easter Seals, Boys & Girls Clubs, Ronald McDonald House Charities, Camp Fire, Girls Inc., Girl Scouts, Kiwanis Clubs, March of Dimes, Muscular Dystrophy Association, Rotary Clubs, Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, Salvation Army, YWCA, America Gives Back (formerly [American] Idol Gives Back), and YMCA

Young Men’s Christian Association, my azz!  No wonder they’re changing their name.

I can name a two more: Home Depot, Sonic Restaurants.

Dawn Eden’s thesis now free August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in General Catholic.
comments closed

Dawn Edens, which examines Christopher West’s work on what is called ‘theology of the body’ in great detail and dispassion, has made her master’s thesis, previously $10, free!  Get it here.

Fr. Z demolishes a rebellious sister (updated) August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in Dallas Diocese, General Catholic, scandals, sickness.
comments closed

And by rebellious, I am being very charitable.  So NCR, the Distorter, that reliably left-wing ‘progressive’ rag that sullies so many parish libraries, has an article on a talk given by Sr. Mary Kane, former head of the Leadership Conference of Women’s Religious (LCWR – the problem sisters), before the ‘Celebration’ conference in Chicago.  Fr. Z proceeds to demolish them.  Probably, most of my readers have seen this already, but for those who haven’t go to Fr. Z’s and read the whole thing.  For the second time in about 2 weeks, NCR has published authors calling for women to leave the Church, and committing outright blasphemy and heresy.  And yet Bishop Zavala, auxiliary of Los Angeles, says us mean ‘ol bullying orthodox Catholic blogs are the problem, with nary a peep for NCR, or US Catholic (which just had an issue endorsing homosexuality as a lifestyle and gay marriage), or any other ‘progressive’ publications.  Duly noted, Bishop – and we know where you are coming from now.  Some excerpts of the talk, and Fr. Z’s fisking (Z in red, as per usual):

“Let me speak now of the women of our Catholic community today. Why do we weep? [sniff] Without the full incorporation of women into leadership, discipleship and all church ministries—which was the vision of the church council—without full incorporation into and participation at the liturgy, [BUZZ WORD ALERT…] we do not experience community as women at liturgy, [LOL!] and we do not experience life-giving worship. Our presence at liturgy has become and continues to be a source of anguish, sadness, even emptiness. [The Anglican Church is ready!  Go to them!  They are waiting to heal your brokenness, dry the tears of the womany community of weeping…ness.] We continue in severe tension over the basic language to describe humanity, and this has gone on for decades, the sexist language that we refer to as exclusive language The continued use of terms like ‘man,’ ‘his,’ and ‘mankind’ denies our very presence. [It’s ineffable, sister.] It certainly doesn’t give recognition and respect; and we are surely invisible. [If only.] The anguish, the distress, the absence of a sense of worship in community has gotten much more severe……….

“Women of the Catholic community. Why are we weeping today? We are in crisis. [Things not going your way these days?] There are a number of women who have already moved out of traditional Sunday worship. They are still finding where they want to go. [Like sheep, without a male shepherd.] We have a number of women who have begun very courageous, strong alternative liturgies, [cf. puppet liturgy photo, above.  But get this… ] which we believe are valid, mystic, pastoral, spiritual—all the qualities that are needed for the human soul. [Except for the whole part about risking going to hell.]

We have many who are moving to other protestant traditions. [The Anglican Church embraces you, Sister, in your angerrrrrr!  Feel the anger.  Feel the power of the dark side of the Force.] We also have a growing number of women who are doing to feminist liturgies, taking turns presiding, co-presiding, perfectly comfortable with it. [Yahhhhhh riiiight…. perfectly comfortable.  I wonder how they decide which of them is going to “preside”.  Imagine that scenario. Does she have more right to preside since she was head of the LCWR?  If the actual head of the LCWR comes along, can she only co-preside?  Who get’s to preside?  Can the sister who has fewer articles in NCR be chosen to embody their embodied…ness?] I think it’s a conscience call. Maybe it is the beginning of a new church. Maybe this is how we have to look at a Pentecost. I think we need to be willing address it. To continue in an exclusively male priesthood is in my judgment both a form and expression of idolatry. [And that, friends, strike me as a clear example of both heresy and blasphemy.  Perhaps Sister’s superior needs to have a chat with her after getting a note from the CDF.]…………

“As a Catholic woman, I continue to hope. Why? At gatherings such as this for these three days, [three … whole… days…] I hear so many women and women who are so open and want to make this a new church. So I go home having been inspired. I don’t really have a need to run back to traditional worship. [Remember that this is a matter of perspective.  For her, you could have just about any wacko thing take place, but if there is a male priest, it is “traditional”.  See how language shifts depending on the context?  But remember: they are open!  They are sooooo open.  Would they be open to a man presiding at their non-traditional self-expression liturgies?  I have a learnéd dubitation about that.] There are many organizations that are very much alive, spiritual and Vatican II: Call to Action, Women’s Ordination Conference, Future Church., [AND…] the congregations of women religious ourselves. [That, friends, may suggest a reason for the Apostolic Visitation.  Am I reading too much into it?] In many ways we are a counter organization within an organization………….

We are creating new liturgies, a new space for ourselves….a Future Church.

Fr. Z seems to have given up on this one – he does not think she’ll ever change, and accept the dogmatic Faith.  He advises she go to the episcopals, where she’ll be more comfortable.  I have prayed for women, and men, who hold opinions like this, for a long time.  Seeing the seething rage that permeates so much of “feminist” Catholicism, and the thinly veiled hatred of men, I know it’s going to take “prayer and fasting for this one.”  God can do anything, but he never forces us against our wills – and in the case of this Sr. Kane, therein lies the problem.  She’d rather hurt and seeth in her pride than convert.  Alot of us do that.  I pray she is touched by the Holy Spirit and comes to her senses.  The hour is late.  The light is dying.

UPDATE: For Bishop Zavala, yet another article in NCR “justifying” women’s ordination, and this one makes a case that apostolic succession isn’t real and doesn’t mean anything!  I eagerly awaith Bishop Zavala to decry the tone and content of these Distorter articles.  And isn’t the distorter engaged in a systematic campaign to undermine Church teaching?  Isn’t there a word for that somewhere?  I think it starts with an S……

Greatness from the Franciscans of the Immaculate August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, Dallas Diocese, General Catholic, North Deanery.
comments closed

Saint Maximillian Kolbe, pray for us!  A homily on judging others by the Franciscans of the Immaculate.  I do not know this priest’s name, but the homily is absolutely spot on.  “Judge not, lest ye be judged”….this is one of the most misinterpreted of Scripture quotes.  It has been used to “justify” all kinds of sin and heresy.  Also…..”love the sinner, hate the sin…”  This also has been badly abused to basically give a pass to individual’s culpability in sin. Like those who enable addicts, “love the sinner, hate the sin” has been abused to give a pass to all kinds of sins.  This is not what Christ meant, at all.  We are, in fact, called to judge those actions and beliefs that we can view well enough to make a determination on based on our sensus fidei, and which are public enough to be our business, such as the “gay outreach” program at Seton

h/t Patrick Madrid

New book offers guidance to those struggling with same sex attraction August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, General Catholic, sickness, Society.
comments closed

In light of my post yesterday on the gay outreach program at Seton, I found today a book review by Matt Abbot at RenewAmerica of a new book released by an orthodox Jew discussing the Torah (much of our Old Testament) and its views on homosexuality.  The book is intended to provide a clear interpretation of the many Biblical prohibitions on homosexuality, as well as providing guidance to those with same sex attraction in leading a chaste, continent life.  A review of this book has been written by Fr. John Harvey, founder of COURAGE, which I referenced yesterday.  Mr. Abbot quotes the review, which I excerpt below:

In his book Light in the Closet, Arthur Goldberg presents the teaching of Torah Judaism concerning homosexuality and the kinds of behavior it commands. A Torah scholar of Orthodox Jewish theology and a certified counselor who works with men and women struggling with sexual confusion, the author demonstrates his grasp not only of psychological theory but also of pastoral practice.

I shall consider first Goldberg’s view of gay activists’ efforts to destroy not only Torah morality but also the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church on homosexual practices. He points to false teachings circulated by gay activists that persons with same-sex attractions (SSA) are born that way, will always remain that way, and cannot get rid of same-sex attractions: “Central to the propaganda behind such travesties is the pseudo-scientific postulate that a gay gene exists and that therefore homosexuality is biologically fated” (47). He recommends, as do I, a book by Neil and Briar Whitehead titled My Genes Made Me Do It: A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation (Lafayette, LA: Huntington House Publishers, 1999). It strongly repudiates the premise of “biologically fated.”

Goldberg describes well the homosexual activist agenda found in the Kirk and Madsen manifesto published in 1989 (After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Loathing of Gays in the 90s [New York: Plume]). Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen were masters of deceit strategy — making use of subliminal perception and clever terminology to change the attitude of the American public concerning homosexual persons from one of hostility to one of benevolence. Goldberg also quotes Rabbi Samuel Dresner, a distinguished author, congregational rabbi, and professor of philosophy who well understood their strategy:

    The Homosexual Activist Movement launched the most successful public relations campaign in the history of the nation and in little more than a decade homosexuals have moved from pariahs to cultural heroes. During this period Americans have not only come to accept homosexuality as an inevitable phenomenon in our society, but also as a legitimate ‘lifestyle’ deserving of affirmation as well as tolerance. (28)

These gay strategists anticipated that the legitimization of the homosexual lifestyle would ultimately be made “without society ever realizing that it had been purposely conditioned to arrive at a conclusion that it thinks is its own” (50–51). In his book Light in the Closet, Arthur Goldberg presents the teaching of Torah Judaism concerning homosexuality and the kinds of behavior it commands. A Torah scholar of Orthodox Jewish theology and a certified counselor who works with men and women struggling with sexual confusion, the author demonstrates his grasp not only of psychological theory but also of pastoral practice.

I shall consider first Goldberg’s view of gay activists’ efforts to destroy not only Torah morality but also the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church on homosexual practices. He points to false teachings circulated by gay activists that persons with same-sex attractions (SSA) are born that way, will always remain that way, and cannot get rid of same-sex attractions: “Central to the propaganda behind such travesties is the pseudo-scientific postulate that a gay gene exists and that therefore homosexuality is biologically fated” (47). He recommends, as do I, a book by Neil and Briar Whitehead titled My Genes Made Me Do It: A Scientific Look at Sexual Orientation (Lafayette, LA: Huntington House Publishers, 1999). It strongly repudiates the premise of “biologically fated.”

Goldberg describes well the homosexual activist agenda found in the Kirk and Madsen manifesto published in 1989 (After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Loathing of Gays in the 90s [New York: Plume]). Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen were masters of deceit strategy — making use of subliminal perception and clever terminology to change the attitude of the American public concerning homosexual persons from one of hostility to one of benevolence. Goldberg also quotes Rabbi Samuel Dresner, a distinguished author, congregational rabbi, and professor of philosophy who well understood their strategy:

    The Homosexual Activist Movement launched the most successful public relations campaign in the history of the nation and in little more than a decade homosexuals have moved from pariahs to cultural heroes. During this period Americans have not only come to accept homosexuality as an inevitable phenomenon in our society, but also as a legitimate ‘lifestyle’ deserving of affirmation as well as tolerance. (28)

These gay strategists anticipated that the legitimization of the homosexual lifestyle would ultimately be made “without society ever realizing that it had been purposely conditioned to arrive at a conclusion that it thinks is its own” (50–51).

Holy smoking gun!  In truth, this planned, coordinated activism with regard to acceptance of homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle, and homosexual acts as essentially benevolent, has been known for some time.  As the commercial say, though, but wait, there’s more!:

Chapter three contains Goldberg’s analysis of the steps involved in this strategy and its insidious rejection of Torah, Christian morality, and natural moral law. Goldberg shows how the gay-activist strategy portrayed the homosexual person as a victim of prejudice and violence. Their strategy showed films of brutalized gays and how they needed protection by society. They say: do not strut our gay pride publicly lest we undermine our victim image. Allow homosexual persons to portray themselves as victims of circumstances who did not choose their orientation any more than they chose their height or skin color. Kirk and Madsen want homosexual persons to cling to the “born that way” theory — even though the authors themselves recognize its invalidity (58). Goldberg points out how Kirk and Madsen revealingly admit that “sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence

Well, duh.  Does anyone not understand this on some level? 

The review is quite long, but I recommend you take the time to read all of it, for it highlights two things: that acceptance of homosexual orientation as benign and homosexual acts as, at least, tolerable, is deadly to a right relationship with God.  This is not my opinion, this is the doctrine of the Faith, supported by numerous passages from Sacred Scripture.  Secondly, this review highlights Fr. Harvey’s adherence to the doctrine of the Faith, showing that Seton would be better served by a gay outreach program associated with COURAGE, and not with New Ways Ministry.

I should add that this book is presented from an Orthodox Jewish perspective.  Jews face the same internal struggles in their religion/culture that Catholics face: that is, “reform”  movements that seek accomodation with the world, and are very willing to dump traditional doctrines of Faith and values in order to conform more ot the world.  So, even though this book is written by a Jew and primarily for a Jewish audience, I think it has great applicability to Roman Catholics, especially those who strive to live their lives in accord with the defined doctrine of the Faith.  The book can be  obtained here.

So much happening today, so little time August 11, 2010

Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, General Catholic, Society.
comments closed

I got a giant, urgent project dumped in my lap (again!), but there is so much going on I’ve got to post.  I earlier discussed the Chris West/Fr. Loya/Dr. Janet Smith interpretations of Pope John Paul II’s series of Wednesday audiences, commonly known as Theology of the Body.  I encourage everyone to go back over to Fr. Angelo Geiger’s site and read all the comments on his most recent post on this subject. I think you may find them illuminating.  Please note the tonal differences between those defending West, and those critiquing.   Also, read a critique of Loya/West by another Theology of the Body instructor, this one from Arizona, who has seemingly deep credentials and offers the view that the defenders of Loya, West, et. al, need to be more humble and more open to criticism, as opposed to shouting down anyone who dare criticize their work.

Matt Abbot joins in the comments section – they are very worth reading.  More in a minute.