jump to navigation

Start Novena to the Holy Face today February 28, 2011

Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, Dallas Diocese, General Catholic, North Deanery.
comments closed

From my secret correspondent:

The feast of The Holy Face of Jesus is Shrove Tuesday, March 8, day before Ash Wednesday
Click here: Devotion to the Holy Face of Jesus 
 
Website for US and Canada is:  http://www.holyface.org/

Novena In Honor of The Most Holy Face Holy Face of Jesus

This novena prayer may be said at any time, but especially in the nine days leading up to the Feast of the Holy Face on Shrove Tuesday March 8 –  The Novena is also available in booklet form see Materials.

THE HOLY FACE OF JESUS

“I firmly wish that my face reflecting the intimate pains
of my soul, the suffering and love of my heart, be more
honoured! Whoever gazes upon me already consoles me.”
(Our Lord Jesus Christ to Sister Pierina)

DAILY PREPARATORY PRAYER (start with this prayer – everyday of the novena)

O Most Holy and Blessed Trinity, through the intercession
of Holy Mary, whose soul was pierced through by a sword
of sorrow at the sight of the passion of her Divine Son, we
ask your help in making a perfect Novena of reparation with
Jesus, united with all His sorrows, love and total
abandon-
ment.
We now implore all the Angels and Saints to intercede
for us as we pray this Holy Novena to the Most Holy Face
of Jesus and for the glory of the most Holy Trinity, Father,
Son and Holy Spirit. Amen. (Start novena)

NOVENA IN HONOR OF THE MOST
HOLY FACE OF JESUS

“All those who, attracted by my love, and venerating my
countenance, shall receive, by virtue of my humanity, a
brilliant and vivid impression of my divinity. This splendour
shall enlighten the depths of their souls, so that in eternal
glory the celestial court shall marvel at the marked likeness
of their features with my divine countenance.” (Our Lord
Jesus Christ to St. Gertrude
)

NOTE: The rest of the prayers are at the link above.  God bless you!

Priests reject Church Doctrine February 28, 2011

Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, Dallas Diocese, foolishness, General Catholic, North Deanery, sadness, scandals.
comments closed

This data is from Australia, but I’m concerned that the same mentality is widespread in the United States and most other ‘advanced’ nations.  In Australia, the vast majority reject Church Authority, reject Magisterial dogmas like that promulgated on contraception, and have a bizaarely vague notion that the laity should have a much greater role in the Church (essentially, a protestant view that the Sacramental priesthood is medieval hooey):

Only 35.4 per cent [of 542 priests surveyed – ED]thought bishops were doing a good job, with one saying their performance was ”between poor and mediocre”. But 43 per cent did not feel nurtured by their bishop while 41.5 per cent did.

Almost 65 per cent did not think Rome understood the challenges facing priests and 70.1 per cent thought it often failed to understand the nature of the Australian church.

This schism was reflected in the respondents’ views on church teachings. Only 19.2 per cent thought it sinful for married couples to use birth control. [I don’t know the percentages in the US, but I do know there are priests in this Diocese who reject Church doctrine on contraception. – ED]

Almost 70 per cent thought abortion was always a sin but only 40.2 per cent said the same of sex before marriage. More than 70 per cent thought celibacy for priests should be optional and several priests made ”no secret of the fact they were in long-term committed relationships with women”. [If these priests cannot be trusted to maintain fundamental, solemn vows they have taken, is it any surprise they find truth such a malleable concept? – ED]

Lay involvement was seen as the church’s greatest internal challenge, with many acutely aware of – and affected by – dwindling attendances. [Increased lay involvement, in the form advocated by these men (essentially, lay people playing at priest) is the cause of dwindling attendances]

 Some comments from priests contained in a book that accompanies the study:

  • “Many of the priests believe the Vatican exercises far too much control in the life of the church, expects far too much regimentation and allows far too little room for local variations in expressions of the faith.”
  • “Many priests bemoan the lost momentum for church reform that grew out of the 1960s and the trend towards the restoration of a more centralised, conservative and rigidly disciplined church over the past 30 years.”
  • “A majority see the need for a Third Vatican Council to build on the church’s engagement with society that was achieved by the Second Vatican Council.” [Yes, because that ‘engagement,’ by which they mean capitulation, has been such a stunning success.  Why, the new springtime is in full bloom all around us]
  • “More generally, in their everyday ministry priests are caught in the conflict of mediating Vatican directives and official church teachings to a laity that is more educated, more sceptical of authority and more willing to think for itself than at any time in the church’s history.” [And these men have played a fundamental role in the laity opposing Church Doctrine!  By making clear THEY themselves don’t accept Church Doctrine, by making snide comments about Rome, by accepting the ‘wisdom of the world’ and rejecting the Truth, which Christ has revealed through His Church, they are encouraging the laity to do so, as well.  And that plays a fundamental role in dwindling attendance!] 

After ‘dissent’ like this has gone on for a very long time, it is extremely difficult o get people back in line with Church Doctrine.  It makes the follow-in priest’s job extremely challenging – if he starts preaching the Faith right away, he is bound to make many mad and make attendance and donations drop, real concerns for any priest.  But it must be done.  The alternative is to continue the slow death of 1000 cuts, as individuals gradually lose the Faith and drift away.  Many priests feel great pressure to follow down the path that has been trod to the wide gate where the way is smooth, so we must encourage with our prayers, or words, and our pocketbooks those priests that adhere to the Faith, who proclaim it in no uncertain terms, who challenge the Faithful to live the Truth Christ has revealed through His Church.  We must challenge priests who evidence the same lack of Faith shown above to do better, to return to the unchanging Truth, to die to themselves and live for Christ.  Ultimately, it comes down to humility, and willingness to accept God’s Will rather than our own selfish desires.  We must do all we can to support our priests, even when that support requires us to challenge what they are doing, for love of them and the Sacramental priesthood.  There is no one else to turn to.

US entitlement programs are unsustainable February 28, 2011

Posted by Tantumblogo in Admin, Basics, disaster, General Catholic, scandals, sickness, Society.
comments closed

You can zero out defense, and everything else, and we’re still running a deficit.  Without controlling federal entitlement programs, this country will never economically recover:

And the deficit will grow horribly worse, year after year, as the boomers retire in greater numbers and the social security obligation explodes.  This is just the beginning.

This is where Catholic social doctrine, at least as interpreted by the USCCB, runs into problems – there isn’t enough money to pay for the promised entitlements.  Even with a massive tax increase, revenues would not greatly increase, as higher tax rates just lead to more income sheltering and depressed economic performance, which keep the coffers from filling as the left likes to fantasize imagine.  In fact, it has been shown that lower tax rates actually lead to more economic growth and higher tax receipts.  However, that is in normal economic times – with so much of the available money being floated as federal debt, that tends to dry up resources for private investment and puts a lid on how much growth can occur.  That is basically what occurs in stagflation – massive federal debt, which the government tries to reduce by printing money, leads to inflation, and also to stagnant growth, or depression, because so much money is being swallowed by the government.

Without a major turnaround, the best we can hope for is a replay of the 70s.  The worst is something alot worse than the 1930s.  And left wing policies make it worse.  The longer we put off addressing horribly underfunded entitlements, the worse the suffering will be.  Not enough children were born 1970 – today to provide enough workers to provide the economic activity to afford the promised benefits.

Report on the ‘Walk for Choice’ February 28, 2011

Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, Basics, Dallas Diocese, General Catholic, North Deanery, sickness, Society.
comments closed

So, I blegged last week asking for folks to come down to the pro-abort ‘Walk for Choice’ that was held downtown this past Saturday to counter-protest, and none of you people showed up, so you’re all fired!  Get off my blog!

End of report.

Just kidding, actually, about 40 pro-lifers were there, to stand for life in opposition to the pro-aborts.  So, what was the pro-abort ‘walk’ like?  Well, it was nothing like the March for Life – first of all, there were only about 200-250 pro-aborts there, in comparison to the 10,000 at the latest March for Life.  There was a fairly interesting demographic breakdown – about 2/3 were college age folks who were very far on the radical side, as evidenced by the prevalence of very conformist expressions of rebellion – lots o’ tatoos, punky hairstyles, cigarette smoke, general lack of personal hygiene.  The youngsters were split about 70-30 female-male. There was another subset of middle aged to elderly women who were probably about 25% of the crowd, and then a smattering of pro-abort parents who brought their kids.  Some salient differences in the behavior of the respective crowds – at the March for Life, faith plays a huge role and the event is very ad hoc – in spite of the speeches and the Mass, it’s a mass of individuals marching, all kind of doing their own thing as they go.  In contrast, the pro-aborts, in typical leftist fashion, are very top-down directed, with a few people with bullhorns leading chants (and with printed pages handed out so everyone could be on board with the chants!) of simplistic messages that are repeated ad nauseum and betray in many cases a lack of deep understanding of just what they are marching for.  The entire event was scripted, excepting when the pro-lifers made that impossible, which I will address shortly. 

Since we were outnumbered 5 to 1, the pro-lifers initially kept a low profile, just witnessing and praying the Rosary while the pro-aborts did their thing.  At one point, the pro-aborts were in front of the JFK Memorial (what a catastrophe that is……), and we were across the street.  A black woman drove by in a minivan and was shouting something about Planned Parenthood out the window, but I couldn’t make it out.  The pro-aborts kept shifting their crowd so they wouldn’t have to see us pro-lifers, so we moved over nearer to the memorial to be in front of them again.  At this point, the black woman who had driven by came walking down the sidewalk, waving a Bible in the air and shouting “Abortion is murder of innocent children.”  Her two boys soon joined her.  They were shouting this at the top of their lungs, and the pro-aborts were very dismayed.  I joined in, and I’ve got a voice that can carry, so the scene devolved into rival groups shouting at each other.  They had bullhorns and scripts, but we had conviction and even though badly outnumbered, it was a fairly even contest. 

After that went on a few minutes, the pro-aborts decided to “march” again, which entailed their going around the block waving their banners and shouting their simple chants (pro lifers you all lie you don’t care if women die, etc).  But as they drifted off, I started asking, very loudly, if these pro-aborts felt they were alive when they were in utero, since they claim abortion is all about ‘choice’ and has nothing to do with life.  I also informed the young ladies that the men holding signs that demanded “free abortion on demand without apology,” meaning you and I get to pay for it, were acting out of narrow interest and had no concern for the women other than the brief pleasure they could provide them.  I think that stung a couple of the young women, I could see it in their reaction.

Some sad notes: a mom had brought her 5 1/2 y/o daughter to the pro-abort event.  I had my 9 y/o and 4 y/o with me, and that sweet little girl asked my daughters if they could play.  The mom had put a “I support reproductive rights” sticker on her little girl, and the little girl had a dolly.  It made me want to cry, because I had to say no, my daughters can not go over among the wastrel pro-abort college age types and play with you (I did not use those words).  And I wanted to ask THE QUESTION, which is, what do you think of the fact that if your mom had wanted to exercise her ‘choice’ with regard to you, you would not be here, but of course I did not.  The mom was terribly embarrassed, as well she should have been.  In the eyes of a child, such a ‘choice’ is indefensible. 

Then, there was the father of two young sons I engaged with as the pro-abort group left to go walk around the block.  I asked him if he was alive when he was a fetus.  He said no.  I said…..wasn’t your heart beating, didn’t you have brainwaves, didn’t your body grow – how were you not alive?  He didn’t say anything that I can recall, so I asked if he was not alive, was he dead?  Of course not, he answered.  So what was he…..then he changed the subject to contraception, and I talked about abortifacients, etc.  He didn’t have much answer, but he certainly thought he was very smart.  He oozed condescension.  Only a simpleton could be pro-life, obviously.  His two sons are named Abraham and Isaac, but he is not religious – I think he thought it was cute, ironic, to name them such.

We left a bit early, before the pro-aborts were done.  Perhaps Andrew or Kassi can fill in some more details from the conclusion of the ‘Walk,’ or send some pictures.  I found it very interesting, and revealing.  The pain of so many of the women ‘walking,’ who have had abortions themselves, is palpable, and colors every aspect of their personality.  They have to embrace abortion as a wonderful, empowering right, because to see it as horribly evil and wrong is too painful – they can’t live with what they’ve done, so they have to lie and turn it into something positive.  I pray for them.

Highly effective pro-life ad February 28, 2011

Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, awesomeness, General Catholic, sickness, Society.
comments closed

Check this out, from American Life League an ad that puts the reality of abortion right up front, but without the ‘off-putting’ bloody images (which is such a sad joke – Americans can watch violent shoot ’em ups night after night but if you show them what a post abortive baby looks like, that’s totally unacceptable):

h/t culturewarnotes