jump to navigation

Crazed Texan feminist Amanda Marcotte is a baby-hating sociopath November 20, 2013

Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, asshatery, Basics, contraception, disaster, error, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, scandals, secularism, self-serving, shocking, sickness, Society, the enemy, unadulterated evil.
trackback

And in other news, water is wet, and humans require oxygen.  If DDLG gets his wish and Texas becomes an independent state, I think we’re going to have to compile a short list of individuals to immediately deport for criminal stupidity/misanthropy.

Amanda Marcotte proves once again that nothing in the universe is more important to her than the continued murder of millions of fellow humans, in this case, likening babies in utero as being akin to bacteria. I won’t import the “tweets” into the page, but some of Marcotte’s statements, instead:

Taking antibiotics terminates more life than an abortion. One organism < the billions you kill with antibiotics.

Well, I oppose the use of antibiotics for everything. Bacteria are innocent and have a right to live.  [But human babies do not.  Thus, the apotheosis of feminist baal-worship, offering human sacrifice to their dark god willingly, but finding in bacteria something precious and possessing great sanctity.]

If you can believe an embryo is greater than a woman, I can believe bacteria has a right to live. [Yes, the old “embryo” canard. Babies only spend a short time as embryos. Virtually every abortion takes place well after the embryonic stage, and occurs when the child has developed to the level of fetus.  And many of these babies are very capable of feeling the horrific torture of surgical or chemical abortion.  But bacteria are much more worthy of life.]

As Robert Stacy McCain said:

So, babies are bacteria and abortion is like antibiotics. This nonsense conclusion is where the syllogism leads, which tells you there must be at least one flawed premise to the pro-choice argument.

Amanda Marcotte simply hates babies and wants them dead.  Her thinking is so perverse, she has so twisted her “thinking” around radical leftist feminist ideology, she can’t even see what a moral monster she has become. I think she’s possessed.

Surprisingly – or maybe not – she grew up in a very isolated part of West Texas in a very conservative family.  Then she went to Austin, got her mind filled with leftist lies (but, she was apparently open to them before she even left home.  I know a couple folks who have met her, and she seems to have rather substantial……issues.  Major daddy issues) and the rest is sad history.

In reality, Marcotte has done us a favor, she has simply, and rather foolishly, revealed the true nature of the feminist ideology. It’s not pro-woman, it’s anti-baby.  It’s most frequently anti-men.  A psychologist might say it is the outward manifestation of a deep-seeded inner loathing.

She is truly a sad creature. I pray for her conversion. She too has a soul, and will one day stand before the Judgment Seat of God.  That is a terrifying thought for the most virtuous soul, but for someone as immoral as Marcotte……I just pray she converts.  Given the positive reinforcement she gets from millions of like-minded femi-leftists, I doubt she will, but I pray for her conversion nonetheless.

 

 

Comments

1. DiscipleoftheDumbOx - November 20, 2013

Pray for her, we should. In the meantime, I shall be working on that list… 😉

2. MMC - November 20, 2013

President Lincoln:

You say ‘A’ is white and ‘B’ is black. It is color, then: the lighter having the right to enslave the darker? Take care. By this rule, you are a slave to the first man you meet with a fairer skin than your own.

You do not mean color exactly — You mean the whites are intellectually the superiors of the blacks, and therefore have the right to enslave them? Take care again: By this rule you are to be a slave to the first man you meet with an intellect superior to your own.

But you say it is a question of interest, and, if you can make it your interest, you have the right to enslave another. Very well. And if he can make it his interest, he has the right to enslave you.
———————————————————————————————

Now let’s make the abortion comparison: if A is a woman and B is an embryo, then the bigger/more developed having the right to kill smaller/less developed? Take care. By this rule, you are to be killed by the first woman you meet who is bigger/older.

You do not mean size/level of development exactly–you mean the women are intellectually superior to the embryos and thus have the right to kill them. Take care again: By this rule you are to be killed by the first woman you meet who is smarter than you are.

But you say it is a question of interest, and, if you can make it your interest, you have the right to kill another. Very well. And if another can make it his interest, they can kill you.

S.L.E.D: Size, Level of Development, Environment, and Degree of dependency. (Check out the YouTube on this concept) If I were bigger, smarter, and less dependent than this woman, can I kill her? “Do unto others as you would have done unto you.” Prayers for her indeed. God bless~

3. Dismas - November 20, 2013

Maybe someone can track this woman until she develops her first life-threatening infection and document her refusal to take antibiotics. It is pretty difficult to find a person older than 6 who has not done so in their lives. Hypocrite.

4. LaGallina - November 21, 2013

Not all femi-leftists are hopeless. Some of us do eventually come around. Do pray for her.

tantamergo - November 21, 2013

Thank you. That was a meaningful reply.

5. MMC - November 21, 2013

I would be tempted to tell this lost woman “you realize that if your mother thought the way you did you wouldn’t be here right now?” I would speak to her inner narcissist. She was once only two cells big…we all were…maybe if we change birthdays to conception they would finally get it through their heads. Thanks for the hope LaGallina! God bless~

6. Dark Brightness | Amanda Marcotte has done humanity a favour. - November 23, 2013

[…] It’s better so see Amanda as pushing an evil polemic. And for that, she does use a aervice. as a certain Dallas Catholic points out: […]


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: