A warning from an LGBTQRSXYZ activist – “make their lives hell”

A “top commenter” pro-sodomy activist on Facebook posted a little warm and fuzzy diatribe about the bare majority – or large plurality – of Americans who still oppose recognizing fake marriages between people of the same sex, or who in general oppose the radical homosex agenda.  10 years ago, one was safely within the mainstream understanding marriage was between a man and a woman.  Brig. Gen. Pete Knight, USAF, Ret, then a California state assemblyman for then very conservative Lancaster-Palmdale, managed to get a state law passed defining marriage as between a man and a woman – and by a large majority.  10 years later, those who still oppose same sex marriage are defined as “homophobes.”  And you won’t be left in peace in your opposition.  Now, any who oppose the radical sodomite agenda will be crushed, and brutally so.  So sayeth the shepherd, so sayeth the flock (language warning):

 

A diabolical shepherd, that is.  

In other words, shut up, they said. Pro-homosex arguments are starting to wear thin, and it appears they have rolled over most of those who can be easily rolled, and are starting to meet more intractable resistance.  Thus, the rhetoric shifts from plays on emotion and Hollywood propaganda, to naked force.  This is a perfect model of Alinskyite communist tactics – pick the target, freeze it, “frame” it (that means, destroy it), etc.  

As another blogger commented, one can have gone from a stalwart supporter of the sodom-gomorrah agenda 10 years ago, by favoring so-called civil unions, to a hateful bigot, all while standing still.  These activists never answer whether their lord and savior Barack Obama is a bigot, or was a bigot, for ostensibly opposing same sex marriage just a year or two ago.  

Where does all this end?  Where will the demands of the activists of sodom stop?  Michael Rose, in Goodbye, Good Men, gives us a clue in his coverage of the travails of one Joseph Kellenyi, who suffered through terrible persecution and wanton advances throughout his time in seminary (he later filed a sexual harassment lawsuit).  Kellenyi relates how some radical sodomites behave when given positions of power, and what it is they crave:

The issue was never one of my suitability for ordination,” Kellenyi explained. “Rather it was that the gay clique had been given veto power over who got ordained in Chicago. [This was during the time of Cardinal Bernadin, and shortly after his death.  May God have mercy on his soul.]Furthermore, the faculty members  in question were not willing to settle for tolerance from me, which I could give.  What they wanted was affirmation and my respect, which I could not give……And the rector even admitted that gay men don’t like people like me.[that would be strong, masculine men]This of course raises the question of heterophobia………when gays come into positions of power, they knowingly and consistently appoint gay men to important key positions.

Of course they do.  They cannot tolerate opposition (that is, orthodoxy), and they are threatened by straight, orthodox seminarians and priests.  But there is much, much more, which I fear may point to the ultimate goal of all this activism:

Kellenyi, who retained dozens of pages of documentary evidence, was expelled from the American College at Loivain[subsequently closed after it became unsustainable due to lack of seminarians.  What a tragedy, once a beacon of orthodoxy, by 2010 there were essentially no students, after so many good students had been run off by events  just like this.  When a seminary falls to a certain, pathetic level, it can only be shut down]  after refusing to submit to an “intimate relationship” that was demanded by a senior seminarian. After he declined the gay seminarian’s offer in no uncertain terms, he was labeled “homophobic,” and denounced for not being “open to embracing gay and lesbian issues.” 

So we see, at least in this particular case, when sodomites feel they have sufficient power, they demand not just “tolerance,” not just affirmation, but fawning respect and even – it is unthinkable – submission to their out of control concupiscence.  This is extremely troubling, even as a mere indication of what may come.  

At present, it is obvious radical homosexual activists are not sated with mere tolerance of their perversion.  They demand everyone accept and AFFIRM them, the better, they hope, to still that quiet voice that torments them in the night.  From affirmation it is a short walk to submission, to God knows what.  As this movement develops, I think it not implausible that there could come a time when failure to submit to sexual advances will be construed as homophobia, and people easily cowed may give in. Thus, the tie in with the hateful, wrathful rhetoric above.  The opposition must be totally crushed to make this cultural abomination a reality.

I have said it before, but there are no limits to the depravity to which people can sink once they cut out God from their lives.  And persisting in a state so visibly and completely opposed to not just the Divine Positive Law, but the natural law, is surely tantamount to cutting God out of one’s life.  That is one thing that makes this “movement” so dangerous.  There is no limit to where it could go.  And even more, there is a powerful motivation in these folks to crush the reminders, ANY reminders that what they are doing is not just wrong, but so completely, horribly wrong as to be an abomination in God’s eyes and something always and everywhere opposed to His Will.  

Scripture is clear – there are over 2 dozen denunciations of homosexual acts in both Old Testament and New. Even the sin of Onan is an implicit repudiation of sterile, homosexual gratification.  The Tradition is clear.  What is unclear, at present, is the will of God-fearing and God-loving people to resist this cultural onslaught.  It is amazing what incredible damage such a tiny portion of the population is capable of doing, but they be doing it, and in spades.