jump to navigation

What we’re up against: radical pro-abort calls babies “time-sucking monsters” – UPDATED March 19, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, Basics, contraception, disaster, error, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, sadness, scandals, secularism, sickness, Society.
trackback

If you guessed Amanda Marcotte, you win the prize.  America’s most well-known baby hater strikes again:

“I don’t particularly like babies. They are loud and smelly and, above all other things, demanding. No matter how much free day care you throw at women, babies are still
time-sucking monsters with their constant neediness.”

Nice.  But wait, there’s more!

No matter how flexible you make my work schedule, my entire life would be overturned by a baby. I like  my life how it is, with my ability to do what I want when I want without having to arrange for a babysitter. I like being able to watch True Detective right now and not wait until baby is in bed. I like sex in any room of the house I please. I don’t want a baby. I’ve heard your pro-baby arguments. Glad those work for you, but they are unconvincing to me. Nothing will make me want a baby. . . .
I like not having a giant growth protruding out of my stomach. I hate hospitals and like not having stretch marks. . . .

This is why, if my birth control fails, I am totally having an abortion.  [I don’t think this is ever to be much of a problem for Miss Marcotte. Her descriptions of wild sexual abandon are rather sad exaggerations]  Given the choice between living my life how I please and having my body within my control and the fate of a lentil-sized, brainless embryo that has half a chance of dying on its own anyway, I choose me. [A “lentil-sized” child would be at about 5-6 weeks gestation. Very few women know they are pregnant at that point.  Most abortions occur at 10-12 weeks, when the baby has a beating heart, head, eyes, limbs, etc.  In short, not a “blob of tissue,” but a readily discernible child]

Obviously, this woman is incredibly wicked.  She just as obviously has severe, severe self-image and psychological problems.  This level of hatred for children is not normal.  But I tell you, there are more and more young people, especially young women, who are getting so twisted off in themselves and the leftist indoctrination they stew in, that the number of like-minded individuals is exploding.  Her kind of mind-blowing selfishness and lack of self-awareness  are spreading like a diabolical virus (and what if your mom had thought the same, Amanda? Then the world would have been spared your insanity.  That’s one of the strongest arguments in favor of abortion I’ve ever seen).

The very rationale behind civilization was to provide a framework where women and children would be protected from various threats and depredations, especially men’s.  Yet it is frequently women who are doing the most to destroy that rationale, and thus, the civilization that rationale supports.  It is so insane as to be unbelievable, yet there it is.

All this stems from being Godless.  There is no limit to the insanity, barbarity, sin, and degradation that people will fall into when they reject God.  What caused the Soviet Gulag that murdered millions of it’s own citizens – godlessness. What gave us abortion and contraception – godlessness.  What allows the government of China to treat its people like rag dolls – godlessness.  What is causing the collapse of Western Civilization – godlessness.

Know your enemy.  Ultimately, its satan, but satan uses people as tools.

UPDATE:  As I said, there are no limits to which godless people will stoop.  A leftist pro-abort organization (but I repeat myself) is giving away coat-hanger pendants to donors to their group:

BjCFNO1IUAEgL96

Comments

1. Stacey - March 19, 2014

I will start off by saying that I am totally on your side on this, but I do have a quibble. Depending on what you mean by “gestation” above (some calculate from conception when giving these sizes, etc, but your doctor calculates from the first day of your last period when he determines how far along you are) a woman would have already missed her period by at least a week or two, possibly (if you are going from conception) up to a month. In this day and age of inexpensive home pregnancy tests, which give results as early as the day of your missed period, I don’t know that it’s reasonable to say that “very few” women would know that they are pregnant at this point. Some women, perhaps, would not know yet. But I think that most probably would.

tantamergo - March 19, 2014

Possibly. I can only go by what I have heard women tell me outside abortion mills. A lot of younger/less educated women are perhaps not as aware of what’s going on with their bodies. Or they use late knowledge as an excuse. All I know is that I have run into many women at mills who say they found out about their pregnancy at about 8 or 10 weeks, often even later. I’d say the median answer is about 10 weeks. They are then in a rush to get an abortion before 12 weeks.

But they could just be saying that, having known for weeks and deciding what to do. That’s very possible. It’s just not what most of these women say. Most present their decision to abort as a very rushed, I just found out and I’ve got to do it now kind of thing. That could be to brush us off better, I don’t know.

Stacey - March 19, 2014

I don’t know either. On the other hand, when we speak of “women” above, that’s very general, not just “younger/less educated women” outside of abortion clinics.

And there may be a bit of denial going on. Along the lines of, “Hmmmm. I’m late. I really don’t want to be pregnant. Maybe if I wait, I’ll get my period and it won’t matter anyway” until it’s been going on for a bit and is sort of becoming undeniable so they finally get a test and it’s official. It wasn’t like they didn’t think it was a possibility before that, but they certainly didn’t want it to be, and they can say that they didn’t “know” because they had chosen not to know.

Most of the women that I’ve encountered (who wanted to be pregnant) were disappointed that they couldn’t be seen for prenatal care until 12 weeks. (The seeming attitude of the doctors being that if you are still pregnant at that point, it’s worth taking seriously. Or something. It certainly wasn’t like they were going to do anything for the baby if anything went wrong before then.)

2. Baseballmom - March 19, 2014

Dear Lord forgive me, but the world would be better off without this woman-thing. I know…. I will pray for her…. Aaaaarrrggghhhh!

3. Kevin Shook (@DFWSHOOK) - March 19, 2014

It is just a matter of time before the pro-aborts start promoting and selling hanger-like devices for “home abortions.”

4. Murray - March 19, 2014

“… Ms. Marcotte notoriously combines self-absorption, lack of self-awareness, vast reserves of hate, and dimness …”
– Steve Sailer

Marcotte is indeed loathsome, but she usefully serves as a conduit for pure, distilled feminist lunacy. Many women who consider elective abortion would shrink from expressing themselves so bluntly, but the underlying sentiment is the same.

5. Terri - March 20, 2014

I don’t know how ANY woman could say “right on!” to this beyond depraved woman, but in this day of run away narcissism, I guess there are some. She is the face of the “new feminism” a truly sick and twisted ideology. How many mindless women will jump on board with her logic? I hope not many…….but then again narcissism rules the day so…….?

6. Terri - March 20, 2014

I should have said…..”narcissism and a healthy portion of self hate”


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: