jump to navigation

The fundamental immorality of protestantism October 23, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, catachesis, Christendom, disaster, Ecumenism, error, foolishness, General Catholic, history, scandals, secularism, Society, SOD.
comments closed

A quick excerpt from Dom Charles Poulet’s A History of the Catholic Church, published in the 1920s.  Dom Poulet was a monk of the great abbey of Solesmes.

On the fundamental errors and immorality of protestantism:

The pivotal dogma of Lutheranism is immoral, because justification by faith alone implies that good works are useless, and the absence of free will implies that it is impossible to be virtuous.  For this reason Luther regarded virginity as an impossible state, [Ha!  Due strictly to his own inability to remain continent.  The man was lost in a sea of lusts, and rather than turn to Grace for help, turned virtue upside down and made sin into good. Incredible that so many people bought it, but that is our fallen nature, always looking for ways to sin and still remain in God’s good pleasure.  Just like today]  and looked upon marriage as as physical necessity to every man, a purely animal act devoid of any sacramental character.  No wonder that his most violent attacks were directed against the monastic vows, and that he himself married (1525) Catherine of Bora, an ex-Cistercian nun.  However, he admitted: “I have made myself so base and  despicable by this marriage that I hope all the angels will laugh and all the demons cry.”  He took to liquor, and according to his own expression, “devoured food like a Bohemian and drank like a Teuton.”  [One is rarely intemperate in only one area, intemperance once committed tends to exert dominance over all aspects of life. Thus, Luther was a drunkard,  there is some evidence of womanizing, and he certainly had a volcanic and unstable temper.] The effects of his teaching upon his contemporaries was equally disastrous.  “License and vicious habits of all sorts,” he was wont to say, “have developed to a degree never attained under papism.”  He was quite conscious that his followers justified their evil manner of living by his own teachings. “If men are not saved by their good works,” they argued, “why should we impose privations upon ourselves?”  In the presence of such results Luther gave way to despair.  “If I had to begin all over again,” he exclaimed, “I would leave the great masses of the people under the direction of the pope; for these people are not amending their ways with the Gospel and are only abusing the freedom than has been granted them.” [You would have thought this might have moved him towards contrition for the infinite evil he had committed, but it was PRIDE that drove Luther more than anything, and he refused to admit, publicly, that he could have been even ever slightly in error.”

Yet hatred of the pope was a salient characteristic of the ex-monk of Wittenberg. “No one,” he said, “can attain to salvation if he does not oppose the dictates of the pope with all his strength.”

[End Quote]

And thus Luther’s biggest failing – hypocrisy – reveals itself.  Luther was incredibly hypocritical.  He claims that man is saved by faith alone and that only the Bible, interpreted by each individual conscience according to the light it receives from God (and never a demon?), and yet in his volcanic temper he cast down all kinds of anathemas of those who took his very principles and started applying them in ways he did not like.  Those who went to far in the revolution he damned, and those who adhered to the Holy See he damned.  Luther was such a hypocrite, as time went on, it became clear that he viewed HIMSELF as the sole authority for the interpretation of Scripture, and that all must conform to his highly variable will.

In reality, Luther’s radically destructive Doctrine, which would have meant the death of Christianity and the end of the protestant revolution in short order, had to be Catholicized by Melanchthon, his close confident.  Melanchthon, especially after Luther’s death, worked to “Catholicize” Lutheranism and expunge much of its more ludicrous elements. While “justification by faith alone” remains a Lutheran tenent to this day, in practice, Lutherans quickly but quietly began to reassert the need for virtuous acts of good for salvation. The other way, Luther’s way, led directly to immense chaos, immorality, and suffering, such as the nightmares of the Peasant’s Revolt and the anabaptists of Munster.

Another salient feature of protestantism is its constant warring against itself into an infinite number of bickering sects.  Indeed, within 3 years of Luther nailing his false “theses” to the door of Wittenberg cathedral, there were already 6 or 8 new groups, spousing new errors, sprung up.  Ten years in, this number had increased to well over a dozen, although some of these sects wound up getting reabsorbed by the state churches that emerged in Germany to take the place of the One True Church founded by Jesus Christ.  Today, of course, there are tens if not hundreds of thousands of competing protestant sects, although most are so indifferent on various matters of belief that they are difficult to distinguish from one another.  But when pressed to the limit, it can be found that the pastor at “Woodcreek” disagrees mightily with the pastor at “Lakepointe” who disagrees violently, on some point, with the pastor at “Watermark.”  And so satan’s plan of division, error, enmity, and, most critically, the loss of souls, continues.

And yet after hundreds of years of opposition, after hundreds of years of seeing the incredibly destructive effects of so-called protestantism, up to and including the destruction of the greatest culture God has ever blessed the world with, Christendom, there is a large majority of prelates, priests, and laity who are more protestant than Catholic, to the extent they are even Christian at all.

I just had the sad experience of debating with a self-described “lukewarm Catholic” or “Catholic Reformed Druid” (no kidding!) various aspects of the Faith.  Even when he admitted his rejection of Church Doctrine was based solely on his own comfort and preference, he still would not be moved.  What shocked me the most is when he said he acknowledged the Real Presence but found it not really that big a deal.  He can’t possibly truly understand what the Real Presence means.

Amazing. That is what 50 years of the formal inculcation of error in the Bride of Christ has wrought.  Lord, have mercy on us.

I hope the above also highlights just how hideous, how wrong the “Joint Declaration on Justification” brought about by…….you guessed it!…….Kasper the Klown Kardinal between the Church and Lutheranism really is.  It is an affront to every faithful soul and yet another example of Christ’s Truth being suborned to worldly ends.

We need a good laugh October 23, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in Admin, disaster, episcopate, error, foolishness, fun, General Catholic, Holy suffering, scandals, silliness, SOD.
comments closed

This laugh brought to you by Bones, and it is much appreciated (by me).  It seems a compilation of music to listen to the Synod will hit Vatican shelves this week:

124

 

When your sitting back, reading that glorious “Relatio,” think how well hearing “Losing My Religion” or “Heartbreak Hotel” will sound?

How about Lonesome, On’ry, and Mean?  That’s how it makes me feel.

Ralph Mooney’s steel guitar played a huge role in defining Waylon’s unique sound.  That and the driving bass line.  Best steel guitar man ever.  Waylon was my age when this was filmed. I must say, though both addicts, he looked a good bit more chewed up at that age than I do.  Heh.  Maybe.

Another good laugh, via Eye of the Tiber. Cardinal Kasper proposes three more Sacraments:

Citing the need for the Church to “update herself with modern times,” Cardinal Walter Kasper declared that the Church has now added three Sacraments to the original seven instituted by Christ. In an interview with America, Kasper explained his decision: “Christ challenged the Pharisees to look deeper than the Mosaic Law, and he challenges us to the same. The original seven sacraments were sufficient for their time, but times have changed, and the Church owes the world a greater number of spiritual life rafts.”

Kasper’s new list of Sacraments is as follows:

1. Baptism

2. Confirmation

3. Eucharist

4. Reconciliation

5. Marriage

6. Holy Orders

7. Anointing of the Sick

8. Annulment

9. That YouTube video of that Lifehouse song with that Jesus skit

10. Christmas trees

Bishop Tobin: “Pope Francis wanted to make a mess. Mission accomplished.” October 23, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, disaster, episcopate, error, horror, sadness, scandals, secularism, sickness, Society, SOD, Spiritual Warfare.
comments closed

I don’t know what to think of Providence, RI Bishop Thomas Tobin. Under Pope Benedict, he was noted for being one of the more vocally orthodox bishops – he even criticized Pope Francis early on – but seemed to have made a turn toward the heterodox over the past year or so (understand the terms orthodox and heterodox are made relative to the present standard in the Church). Perhaps he was tacking into the prevailing winds.  But now Bishop Tobin seems to be saying that the Pope has made a doctrinal mess of the Church:

Thomas J. Tobin, the Catholic bishop for the Diocese of Providence, R.I., commented on the recent Synod of Bishops on the Family held at the Vatican as “being rather Protestant” in having bishops vote on “doctrinal applications,” and added that in terms of Pope Francis’s fondness for a “creating a mess,” you can say, “mission accomplished.”

“Pope Francis is fond of ‘creating a mess.’ Mission accomplished,” said Bishop Tobin in his Oct. 21 blog post at the Diocese of Providence website. [Which isn’t absolutely a criticism. It certainly can be taken as such, but if one was into modernism it could be looked on as a good thing. But I don’t think that’s what Bishop Tobin meant.]

……Commenting further on the Synod, Bishop Tobin said,The concept of having a representative body of the Church voting on doctrinal applications and pastoral solutions strikes me as being rather Protestant.”  At the close of the Synod, the bishops voted on all 62 paragraphs in the final document, the Relatio Synodi. [Yeah, you’re not the only one.  But see what he says below.]

The Synod of bishops will meet again in one year to review the document, make more changes, and then Pope Francis will review that material and write a public letter on the family and marriage issues examined. [Oh goody.  I just can’t wait.  Be still my heart.]

As for more of his “Random Thoughts about the Synod on the Family,” Bishop Tobin said:

“Have we learned that it’s probably not a good idea to publish half-baked minutes of candid discussions about sensitive topics, especially when we know that the secular media will hijack the preliminary discussions for their own agendas? [Please.  It wasn’t half-baked, it was written weeks in advance.  What a joke.  And the man who wrote it, Archbishop Forte, is a disciple of Kasper/Kung/Rahner/von Baltasar and the whole school of Tubingen, and slippery as an eel.]

— “Wherever he serves, Cardinal Burke will be a principled, articulate and fearless spokesman for the teachings of the Church.” [Dang straight.  And possibly emerge as a desperately needed leader.]

Thanks to reader D for the link.  Some more of Bishop Tobin’s comments, perhaps less reassuring:

In addressing contemporary issues of marriage and the family, the path forward will probably be found somewhere between the positions of Fr. Z and the National Catholic Reporter. [Amazing he knows who Fr. Z is.  Probably 2/3 of American bishops would have no clue, while they would have intimate familiarity with Michael Sean Winters, the Heretic Reporter, and Thomas Reese.  Nevertheless, here we see another bishop pretending Doctrine – eternal Truth revealed by Jesus Christ – can be compromised on.  Muy malo.]

Pope Francis encouraged fearless and candid discussion and transparency during the Synod. I wonder if the American Bishops will adopt the same protocol during their meeting next month in Baltimore. [Heh. Nice zinger.]

I for one am extremely saddened to see yet another American prelate, like Cardinal Burke (who surely deserved his stunning demotion), fall out of that precious full communion with the pope.  So sad.

Burke Galero

He comes for you, Frankie.

It’s called sarcasm, people.

Seriously, though, how much are the apparitions at Fatima, Akita, and Quito being borne out?  Bishop against bishop, cardinal against cardinal……..it’s 1517 all over again.  Just great!

The farce of it all: Kalifornia uber alles orders churches to fund abortions – or else October 23, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, contraception, disaster, error, foolishness, General Catholic, paganism, persecution, secularism, self-serving, sexual depravity, Society, unadulterated evil.
comments closed

Well, surprise, surprise, surprise……as part of its enforcement of Obamacare, the state of Kalifornia has determined that surgical abortion now constitutes “basic health services” and must be covered by ALL insurance plans, whether the holders of those plans are churches with moral objections to the murder of babies or not.  Everyone with a brain knew Obamacare would wind up instituting universal coverage for grave moral evils like contraception and abortion even on churches, even on the Church.  Kalifornia has simply jumped the gun a bit. Whether this will hold up in court, it all depends on what the magic 8 ball of Anthony Kennedy says on that particular day:

For the past four years, the Obama administration and its friends on the Left were careful to claim that they still strongly support religious libertywhile arguing that Hobby Lobby’s Green family, Conestoga Wood Specialties’ Hahn family, and others like them must lose. Principally, they contended, religious liberty protections could not be applied to Hobby Lobby because (1) It is a for-profit corporation, (2) It isn’t a church (and thus not a true “religious employer”), and (3) It is wrong on the science—Plan B, a copper intrauterine device, et cetera, they claimed, do not cause abortions. [WRONG.] They implied, if not claimed outright, that they would surely support religious freedom in another case, but Hobby Lobby was unworthy to claim its protections. [Horse hockey]

The State of California is now calling their bluff. California’s Department of Managed Health Care has ordered all insurance plans in the state to immediately begin covering elective abortion. Not Plan B. Not contraceptives. Elective surgical dismemberment abortion. 

At the insistence of the American Civil Liberties Union, [a long time communist front group, founded by a communist] the DMHC concluded that a 40-year-old state law requiring health plans to cover “basic health services” had been misinterpreted all these decades. Every plan in the state was immediately ordered, effective August 22, to cover elective abortion. California had not even applied this test to its own state employee health plans (which covered only “medically necessary” abortions). But this novel reading was nevertheless quietly imposed on every plan in the state by fiat.……..[Ah, the leftist’s favorite word…….fiat]

…..Several other California churches have received similar notices from their insurers, and others will follow. While California (like the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS) exempts churches from its contraceptive mandate, there is no exception to this bureaucratic abortion mandate. This leaves California churches in the illogical and impossible position of being free to exclude contraceptives from their health plan for reasons of religious conscience but required to provide their employees with abortion coverage. [And even more illogically, chemical abortions are excluded, but not surgical ones!  They must really feel a need to ramp up the offerings to satan there in the Kalifornia state government.]

This California mandate is in blatant violation of federal law that specifically prohibits California from discriminating against health care plans on the basis that they do not cover abortion.[So there had to be a law enacted specifically to keep Kalifornia from persecuting churches?  Do they pick on mosques in the same way?]  Alliance Defending Freedom and Life Legal Defense Foundation have filed administrative complaints with the HHS Office of Civil Rights (which oversees this federal law) on behalf of individual employees and seven California churches forced into abortion coverage in violation of their conscience.

What will be the administration and the Left’s response to this unprecedented attack on religious liberty? If they couldn’t stand with Hobby Lobby because it was a for-profit business, not a church, and because they thought its conscience concern was misplaced on the abortifacient nature of Plan B, will they now demand religious liberty for churches forced to cover elective abortion? If not now for religious liberty, when?

Oh please, never.  They don’t give a squat for “religious liberty,” “freedom of worship,” or any  of it.  To the militant sexular pagan left, religion is  for bitter clingers who just can’t get with the program in modern society without a crutch.  Even over just the past few years, the left’s open hatred for bible-@#$%ing Christofascist God botherers [their terms] has grown more and more open. They’ll say what is politically convenient at a particular time, but when push comes to shove, when it’s time to ratchet up the persecution another notch, all on the left will eagerly support the new measure, while the right will just mewl a bit and say how unfair it all is.

Guess what, the left doesn’t care about fair, or truth, or being exposed as hypocrites, or being shown to have massive double-standards, or anything else.  All the left cares about is naked power, and gradually assuming more and more of it.  To the extent any organization poses even a possible threat to that power, it will be crushed.  This is why the left, whenever it has seized unequivocal control in any nation, has always made persecution of organized religion one of its first moves. From France in 1789 to the Piedmont in 1848 to all of Italy in 1870 to Russia in 1917 to Eastern Europe in 46-48 to Chile in ’73 to Nicaragua in ’79, the left has always either co-opted the Church when possible (Nicaragua, largely) or tried to crush it out of existence.

The left is a product of endarkenment rationalism which itself was founded on (often well hidden) hatred of Christianity and the Church in particular.  Reading pre-conciliar Church histories, biographies of Saints and popes, and the like, makes clear the extent to which the pre-conciliar Church understood the radical political left to be its deadly enemy.  Reality hasn’t changed since then, what has changed is the attitude of most in the Church, who have decided its easier to be co-opted than to fight.  But make no mistake, the left will only allow a completely pliant, indifferent, ineffective, and pointless shell of a Church – otherwise, the left is always the inveterate enemy of the Church, with the greater the leftness, the greater the hatred.

 

Catholic Tradition – Mass offered aboard LST-782 off the coast of Iwo Jima in WWII October 23, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Eucharist, fun, General Catholic, Glory, Grace, history, Latin Mass, sanctity, Tradition, Virtue.
comments closed

Reader MFG sent this in and it is great.  I don’t think I would have enjoyed much swaying back and forth as they did during this Mass on board ship.  Must have been some pretty good swells.  Unpleasant, to say the least.

This is how the Mass was offered for well over a millennium, before the dark times, before the Empire, er  I mean the “reforms.”  Sorry, channeled Obi Wan Kenobi there for a minute:

Just a bit of Catholic greatness for you.

The expense is reckoned, the enterprise is begun; it is of God, it cannot be withstood.  So the faith was planted; so it must be restored.

And so it will be.  All in God’s good time.

Great sermon on the horrid evil of admitting manifest sinners to the Blessed Sacrament – FIXED October 23, 2014

Posted by Tantumblogo in abdication of duty, Basics, Bible, Christendom, damnable blasphemy, disaster, episcopate, error, Eucharist, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, Latin Mass, sadness, scandals, secularism, self-serving, SOD, Tradition, Virtue.
comments closed

I do not know this priest’s name, and even if I did they like to be anonymous, anyway.  But this is the 5th or 6th sermon of his I’ve heard that has extremely solid.

The priest goes over very solid ground rules regarding the state our souls must be in for valid and holy reception of the Blessed Sacrament, reception that fills our souls with Grace instead of bringing condemnation upon us.  The priest notes that sins against the 6th and 9th Commandments have always been understood as placing a soul in a position that it is unworthy to receive Christ Real Presence.  A dead body cannot be fed, the priest notes, and in the state of mortal sin, our souls are dead.

After solid background, the priest shifts to the recent Synod of Darkness.  He notes how it appears that many bishops are not interested in guarding the Holy of Holies.  The priest goes on to list aspects of the egregious elements of the midway “Relatio” which has served as an awesome tool in advancing the modernist agenda and the destruction of souls, hardly ameliorated by the “revolt” of October 16 and some changes to the final document.  As far as millions of souls are concerned, including some either badly informed or willingly duped Catholics, the Church has formally changed 2000 year old Doctrine.  The damage is incalculable.

Lots and lots of good stuff below.  I strongly advise dedicating 18 minutes to listen:

“Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the Kingdom of God?  Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor the effeminate, [transgenders, cross dressers, etc]  nor liers with mankind, [sodomites, gomorrists] nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the Kingdom of God.” [1 COR VI:9]  

And thus we know why there is such a powerful movement among liberal Christians, especially those ludicrous sects dedicated towards producing a mockery of Christianity to serve the sodomite interest, either totally downplay Saint Paul or actually advocate for the exclusion of all his Epistles from the Bible.  There is no limit to which error and sin will not stoop.

I pray you find this edifying, as I did.

UPDATE: Thank you to the commenter for letting me know it was the wrong video.  It’s those darned Youtube playlists, if I go to VideoSancto’s page on Youtube, and see the list of all their videos, if I click on one, it doesn’t give me the direct link to that video, but a link embedded in a playlist.  So when VideoSancto uploads a new video, the list updates, and the video I wanted is no longer there – same link, different video. My apologies, that always gets me.