Duke is less than 5% muslim. Assuredly there are far more at least nominal Christians there, and probably at least as many reasonably active or devout Christians. This was yet another exercise in the liberal elite (self-anointed) kow-towing to muslim self-assurance. Liberals perceive muslims as being more devout and committed to their cause than liberals are to theirs, and so they cave, giving into a religion that is irretrievably hostile (and violent towards) so many of liberalism’s most cherished assumptions and aims, but because they pose a threat, are a distinguished “other,” and aren’t, God forbid, Christian, they get extra-special nice treatment leftists would never accord to Christians.
These leftists, they will convert to the most repressive forms of islam before they will accept Christianity. That’s a diabolical belief system if I’ve ever seen one.
Years ago, way back around 9/11, in that military group I was in, a very strange but very brilliant woman said that mohammad would be preached from the pulpit of Oxford to the total exclusion of Jesus Christ during her lifetime. Back then I thought she was wrong, now, I’m not so sure.
I fear it is only a matter of time before this kind of thing becomes a regular reality.
And to those who say “oh, look, Duke already gives very special treatment to Christians in the form of having services in the chapel, so you’re just a hypocrite!”. Please. First of all, who founded Duke? Methodists. Secondly, what is the religion of the vast majority of its students? See above. Thirdly, there is an enormous difference between allowing a facility to be used for PRIVATE services and the public proclamation of a certain religion from the ostensibly Christian chapel. The tolling of a bell is not in any way equivalent to public broadcast of prayers.
Universities today go to very great lengths to make sure any Christian activities that take place on their premises are private. They repeatedly take steps to block many forms of expressing the Christian faith in public. So this was a very significant move. “Tolerance” was going to be granted to one favored religion – what one might call the de facto religion of the United States and most of the West – that is not shown on the same scale or degree to the other, actually dominant religion of the land. It was hypocrisy of the highest order, and shows once again that liberal shibboleths will not stand against strong and martial religious conviction, at least islamic conviction.
That’s not lunacy, that’s reality. And no your comments won’t see the light of day.