A Blog for Dallas Area Catholics

Are LGBT types taking advantage of downtrodden people to get access to children? February 5, 2015

The title of the post is a bit misleading…….in an article at The American Thinker, a woman raised by lesbian parents makes an interesting argument that children have become pawns to the sodomite community in their quest for social and cultural verification through their dreamed-up right to “marry.”  There are some dark hints in the below that these people are acquiring access to children by pressuring people (like single mothers) in difficult circumstances to adopt children, and then use the fact that they are raising them to provide a powerful argument in favor of state recognition of fake, perverse marriages.

Also noted below is the careful choreography at play in how the matter of “gay marriage” is presented to the public.  Very photogenic, apparently “normal” couples are screened and selected to be the public face of this movement, but the reality, according to the author, is often quite different.

I must say, the author takes a very dim view of the motives behind adoption by perverse couples (or groups of loosely related people, as they often really are).  There are parts of the argument I disagree with profoundly, such as her stating that cultural prohibitions  (do any even remain?) against single motherhood are somehow misogynistic.  That’s beyond dumb.  In order to oppose adoption by sodomites or gomorrists, she attempts to excuse and normalize badly disordered situations.  A better argument would have been to note that both phenomenon, single motherhood AND same-sex couples adopting children tend to attack the very basis of the family while often treating as commodities.

However, I link to the post because it does make a number of very good points. I left out most of the bad stuff. See what you make of the below (I add emphasis and comments):

The “marriage equality” arguments leverage children, often claiming that if gay adults can marry the children they are raising will benefit from broader “protections.” This is doublespeak. The “protections” consist of the gay adults’ access to and control of children as commodities. Activists have enough savvy to realize it is better that people did not see this hidden inconsistency. Most people are still fixated on the initial claims: “between two consenting adults who are not hurting anyone else.” [That’s wrong off the top, they are hurting everyone, themselves most of all. Just because an activity occurs in nominal privacy does not mean it is not moral poison for the entire culture.  That is why St. Paul said that when one sins, that sin impacts the entire Body of Christ.]

Not a single same-sex couple can reproduce together. It behooves us to analyze the ways that same-sex marriage demands other people’s children as a “civil right” and in so doing invariably denies both women their own children and children their right to a mother and a father……

……People use their children in all kinds of ways. Except these are often other people’s children and they did not have to be conscripted to a life of distortion and play-acting. These children are never the result of same-sex couples’ accidental pregnancy. In this case, nobody forced them to “adopt” children, so it seems a tad manipulative to use these children to back an argument for marriage. Juxtaposed alongside the description of bad mothers stands the worthiness of the plaintiffs.….. [What has this author so exercised, is the fact that the court case that will go before the Supreme Court shortly to decide whether states must allow sodomite marriage was based on the claims of a gomorrist couple that had adopted children from mothers in difficult circumstances. A judge based a dissent in the case on the fact that the prospects for the children were better in the gomorrist couple than with their birth parents. But precious little was said about how the couple managed to obtain the children, nor what kind of counsel or aid was given to the mothers when they were possibly pressured to give up their children.  As the author notes, this is a race to the bottom, drug-addicted mothers giving up their children to these incredibly disordered situations.]

……I suspect that a culture that needs to traffic in distortions is inherently abusive. The gay marriage narrative needs to be defended at all costs and requires enforced compliance from others. This can be seen in the parenting as well as the political strategies. The only difference is the scale and the target of the coercion. On a broad political level, consider the Log Cabin Republicans and the fact that this movement only stands to benefit from society withholding services and support that would enable vulnerable poor women to keep their children (when they are actually the mother). This becomes predatory in practice and anti-equality in intent. [Interesting point. I would rather the Republican party formally repudiate the Log Cabin Republicans, but I shan’t hold my breath. Those guys have deep pockets, and politicians love their money]

……..Maybe people need to demand that they stay out of women’s wombs and stop trying to enforce their parental will on children. They ought to respect the fact that all children have the right to a mother and a father. [I agree.  As the author noted above, if you want to choose this lifestyle, you are saying goodbye to ever being a parent.  This to me seems like foundational logic.  Same-sex couples are inherently sterile, which is a prime reason why they are so disordered.  They are trying to ape healthy married relationships by acquiring children through various means.  In a sane society, even the very concept would be utterly abhorrent.]

Recently gay activist Dan Savage called publically for the criminal prosecution of the parents of a teenager who had just committed suicide (Joshua/Leelah Alcorn). Let’s examine this too. He has demanded that LGBT activists serve as state-sanctioned overlords who will enforce their control and worldview on heterosexual parents and their children. This is the next wave: Co-parenting with GLAAD and the Human Rights Campaign. Maybe Terry Bean will babysit after he resolves his legal issues. [This is the next thing. They don’t just seek constant verification for their perversion, they seek control. They will try to control society to not just permit, but extol and dang near (if not outright) make their perversion mandatory.  I know people probably read this and think I’m nuts, but top activists like Savage have said, though not in so many words, just that.  They want access to children to form them in their lifestyle and insure that it is as widespread and accepted as possible, up to and including performance of those horrid acts that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.  That is the ultimate goal – a society where sodomy is not just accepted, but lionized as the ideal, and all but required, behavior.]

The new social justice dictum is that society owes LBGT people the flesh and blood of other people’s children because they are “married” now. Let’s be honest. Love does not make a family in this case. Human trafficking does.

———End Quote———

That’s a pretty damning indictment, but is it incorrect?  These couples (or groups) cannot have children without obtaining either one half of the seed of life from the opposite sex, and possibly also borrowing a womb.  This process turns human beings and God’s gift of procreation into a manufacturing process.  It is grotesque.  But it is one of the main means by which the sodomite activists project normality.  As the author noted, carefully chosen “gold star” types are always the protagonists in the legal cases that seek to advance the false, illusory “rights” of these people. We rarely see the devastation their need for acceptance and normality causes.