jump to navigation

Pope: weapons manufacturers who call themselves Christians are hypocrites June 23, 2015

Posted by Tantumblogo in Christendom, disconcerting, episcopate, error, foolishness, General Catholic, Papa, persecution, pr stunts, rank stupidity, scandals, secularism, Society, the return, the struggle for the Church.
trackback

So…….they have that going for them.  I’ll preface the post by saying this explosive comment as quoted below is confirmed by Zenit in its entirety.  In fact, I’m going to switch from the Reuters report below to Zenit as I go along, so  you can get see the quote in context.

I really don’t know what to say anymore, this comes from the endless stream of off-the-cuff, rambling discourses made after the Pope spikes his prepared text, in this case, in Turin.  Blanket condemnations like these lacking any distinction or apparent charity for those concerned have been the hallmark of this papacy.  This kind of statement is not only imprudent, it approaches calumny.  Weapons of all kinds are tools and while they may be unpopular in certain quarters (especially among progressives, whose distaste for weaponry is only exceeded by their ignorance of it) simply designing, building, and selling them cannot be said to be immoral.  It depends entirely on the circumstances:

People who manufacture weapons or invest in weapons industries are hypocrites if they call themselves Christian, Pope Francis said on Sunday.

Francis issued his toughest condemnation to date of the weapons industry at a rally of thousands of young people at the end of the first day of his trip to the Italian city of Turin.

“If you trust only men you have lost,” he told the young people in a long, rambling talk about war, trust and politics after putting aside his prepared address.

“It makes me think of … people, managers, businessmen who call themselves Christian and they manufacture weapons. That leads to a bit a distrust, doesn’t it?” he said to applause.

OK, so here I cut to Zenit, for the entire quote:

It makes me think one thing: people, leaders, entrepreneurs that call themselves Christians, and produce arms! This gives some mistrust: they call themselves Christians! “No, no, Father, I don’t produce them, no, no …. I only have my savings, my investments in arms factories.” Ah! And why? “Because the interest is somewhat higher …” And a double face is also a current coin today: to say something and do another. Hypocrisy…….[That’s a pretty nasty little comment about being two faced.  He immediately segues into genocides (Armenia, Jews in WWII), as if the arms manufacturers somehow precipitated them.]

Now back to Reuters:

He also criticised those who invest in weapons industries, saying “duplicity is the currency of today … they say one thing and do another”.

Francis also built on comments he has made in the past about events during the first and second world wars.

He spoke of the “tragedy of the Shoah,” using the Hebrew term for the Holocaust.

“The great powers had the pictures of the railway lines that brought the trains to the concentration camps like Auschwitz to kill Jews, Christians, homosexuals, everybody. Why didn’t they bomb (the railway lines)?”

OK, no offense to His Holiness, but his comments are internally contradictory.  He makes plain in this last quote that military force/weaponry CAN do good things. He claims the Allies were bad for not bombing the railways to the concentration camps. There were many reasons for not doing so, which I won’t go into now, but the matter is not so simple as Pope Francis makes it out to be.

And what if they had?  The Germans were past masters at overcoming the effects of incredibly heavy bombing.  Reading the biography of Kurt von Schuschnigg makes clear that even in 1945 the trains ran nearly on time, with only periodic delays to repair tracks that were cut by bombing (which were usually repaired in hours if not minutes).  The point being, the Allies could have bombed the railroad tracks till they were blue in the face and it would have had only the slightest of impacts on the death toll in those camps, but it would have had a very negative impact on the main goal of the war – the defeat of Nazi Germany. In fact, such a campaign could have prolonged the war and led to MORE deaths, not fewer.  All this criticism of the Allies for their failure to “do something” about the death camps is just so much after the fact liberal hand-wringing with more than a tinge of moral superiority.  The Allies did in fact do much to stop the killings in the death camps, by invading and conquering Germany at the earliest possible moment. That was the only really effective way to stop the attempted extermination of the Jews.

There is an aspect of tragedy about this Pope.  Moments before he made these silly, reflexively progressive statements about arms manufacturers, he have a really very moving exegesis on the virtue of chastity.  It was very good, but it is also completely forgotten and ignored, washed away in the media firestorm over these strange statements the Pope seems incapable of restraining himself from making.  The good this Pope says or does gets washed away in the constant stream of media-friendly, progressive-friendly rhetoric.

As to his more general comments on the arms industry, others have already pointed out instances where military force and armaments have certainly been used for moral good. Goodness, the conversion of the Roman Empire to Christianity was marked by a decisive military victory.

I think this is yet another instance where Francis’ provincialism really shows.  The military has been persona non grata in Argentina since 1983 when the last of the juntas fell.  Due to their role in the ugly shadow civil war that gripped Argentina (initiated by attempted marxist takeover of the country) for decades prior, the military is viewed highly unfavorably by a large majority of Argentines, especially those associated with the Peronist camp (which, ironies never cease: Peron came to power through military coups, being an army general, and the present government is hardly innocent when it comes to use of force against dissent).  Argentina has almost no arms industry to speak of (though I did get a nice gun from BERSA recently).  There once was a decent sized one, but as part of the general falling out of favor of all things military it has been allowed to collapse.  This lack of respect for the armed forces is a pretty common feature of Latin American life, since the military in most of those countries is used much more to deal with internal threats rather than external ones.

So Pope Francis comes from a milieu that sees the military as populated by sickos who want to work their fantasies of violence on innocents, and armaments as the tools they use to do so.  It is the polar opposite of how most people in the Anglosphere tend to view the military, with a 3 or 400 year history of its use primarily to deal with foreign threats rather than as a tool to crush internal dissent.

The tragedy of Francis’ provincialism is that contra a much more cosmopolitan Pope like Benedict XVI or John Paul II, Pope Francis seems to have a great deal of difficulty expanding his worldview beyond his own narrow experience.  He views the world from a profoundly Argentine, but even more, Peronist viewpoint, with all the biases and limitations that implies.  He seems to have a great deal of difficulty recognizing that other people have had radically different experiences with whatever – the military, capitalism, technology, industrialization – aspect of society he wants to decry, and that their experience gives them a very different appreciation of these matters.  And since so many of these matters he gets exercised about, from how to deal with ostensible global warming to the right conduct of the arms trade, are matters of prudence, he winds up casting an awful lot of people out of the Church for what are disagreements on prudential matters.

I feel bad for my many friends who serve in the military or work for Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, Vought, General Dynamics, Bell Helicopter, and many other places.  This is surely a a discomfiting thing for them to hear.  Given how many people attracted to the TLM work in these kinds of industries, I hope some good traditional priest can give a sermon that sets the record straight on the morality of being employed in such endeavors.  I’ve tried a a bit above, but I’m neither a theologian or priest, and so my response is necessarily limited.

And so the sadness continues.  A little more Pope coverage today, then I’m going to take a break for a while, barring any really momentous events.

 

Comments

1. TG - June 23, 2015

I just can’t read anything the Pope says anymore. I may need a break from blogs or just not read those posts about him.

2. St. Anibale - June 23, 2015

I really agree with TG. Moreover, what to do when the Pope just makes himself irrelevant to you?

3. Tim - June 23, 2015

“Francis fatigue”

St. Anibale - June 23, 2015

Francis Fatigue. That’s it! That’s the diagnosis. So is this an intentional result or just accidental?

4. Pseudodionysius - June 23, 2015

“Swiss Guard” then becomes the name of a new non-stick deodorant and not a military force.

Kewl!

5. Don - June 23, 2015

My late Uncle George was a German POW in WW II. They were forced into fixing the bombed rail lines after the Allies bombed them. Sometimes this occurred several times in a week. The lines to the camps would have been fixed in short order. Plus, bombing was not that precise, and the fact is there was a good chance missing the rail points would have seen the bombs hit the camps. Imagine the rubbish we would be told about that, over-and-over, had that happened.

The tired old story that it was the Allies partly to blame for not bombing the rail lines into the camps is a Jewish fraud. Why Francis even felt the need to reference this when he was spinning a tale against armaments is beyond bizarre. Beyond bizarre.

St. Anibale - June 23, 2015

Men “become” women. Women “become” men. Persons of Nordic/Germanic ancestry become “black.” The Bishop of Rome gives aid and comfort to the enemies of Christ. Beyond bizarre, for sure. Explainable, but beyond bizarre. I’da never thunk it.

6. Joseph D'Hippolito - June 23, 2015

According to James Pavlick, the Vatican is the largest shareholder of Beretta.

Bernardo Nogara, Pope Pius XI’s financial advisor, invested Vatican funds heavily in corporations that made armaments — and with Pius XI’s knowledge and consent. Vatican finances directly supported Mussolini’s conquest of Ethiopia and the Axis’ war effort.

Where did Nogara get the money? When Italy and the Vatican signed a treaty in 1929 that enabled the Vatican to maintain its status as an independent state, Mussolini gave the new state 750 million lire in cash as well as consolidated bearer bonds with a coupon rate of five per cent and a nominal value of 1 billion lire. The funds were indemnification from Italy for seizing parts of the Papal States to incorporate into the Italian nation in the 1860s. I have no idea how much this would be in dollars or pounds sterling.

When this Pope actually sells some of the billions the Vatican owns in stocks, bonds and other financial vehicles and give some of those proceeds to ministries and agencies helping the poor and persecuted Christians, then I’ll take him seriously. He can start by divesting from those armaments manufacturers in which the Vatican has investments.

This Pope is like Mrs. Jellyby, the Dickens character who felt compassion for the poor who lived far away but did nothing for the poor in her own backyard.

St. Anibale - June 24, 2015

Touche!

7. Gary - June 23, 2015

Our Christian brethren in Middle East get there throats cut because they are unarmed. No protection from Rome or the White House; you can bet they have body guards though. That’s Hiprocrital.

8. Joseph D'Hippolito - June 23, 2015

BTW, let’s be honest here: The Pope isn’t the only Catholic who believes this. The Catholic Worker movement is filled with people who think the exact same thing. Pacifism is becoming more and more popular in the Catholic Church.

Tantumblogo - June 23, 2015

No disagreement here.

9. Magdalene - June 23, 2015

I once had a pastor who would not let the Knights of Columbus wear all their regalia, especially no swords. He also would not have the US flag in the church. Of course he did not like the Catechism and there were other issues. The newest bishop has sent him ‘far far away’ to discern if he wants to continue as a priest.

We need weapons to defend ourselves against invasive enemies. Maybe when the isis threat against Rome actually materializes, there will be a different thought on weapons.

Francis fatigue….sad, but there it is . I know he throws out nuggets here and there that do conform to Church teaching but they are only a small percentage of the enormous wordiness coming from him. And much of the words are distressing or castigating someone or name calling, etc.

camper - June 24, 2015

I think the trad position is to keep the US flag out of the Church. For most of our history, it has symbolized the oppression of Catholics, since America was protestant and took away our schools.

Tim - June 24, 2015

Amen, brother!!

10. LaGallina - June 23, 2015

Mexicans are sitting ducks because guns are strictly forbidden. My widowed mother-in-law in Reynosa keeps a hammer nearby in case of a break in. (Someone did try to break in recently, but couldn’t get in — thank God!!) Her best friend in Monterrey was recently held up and robbed. My son plays on a Mexican soccer team in Matamoros, and says that pretty much all of the boys on his team have experienced the now infamous “Mexican violence.” My brother -in-law is building a wall in front of his house in Guadalajara — the once-safe Mexican city because the violence has been so bad.

No one has the ability to protect himself or his family. It is really taking a toll on Mexican daily life. If guns are banned in the U.S., the same thing will happen here.

Cristero - June 23, 2015

You nailed it, Miss Chicken. Folks wonder at the fact that El Paso is one of the safest cities in the country and Cd. Juarez is so violent. This may not explain the whole thing, but it is a big part of the reason.

11. MFG - June 23, 2015

Once again the Holy Father creates a straw man just to tear him down. If he truly believes these type of people do exist why go talk to them directly rather than a blanket statement?

12. Baseballmom - June 23, 2015

A commanding General. And economics expert. Expert on the reasons for Climate change…. What else is this fellow proficient in?

13. Murray - June 23, 2015

Our new bishop regularly decries weapons manufacturers in his roamin’-through-the-nave homilies. Like Pope Francis, he seems to believe that weapons manufacturers are responsible for violence.

I have a terrible poker face, and this kind of thing from our bishop usually causes me to look miserable, but then I remember this classic Treehouse of Horror episode and chuckle.

Aaahh! He’s got a board with a nail in it!

14. Frank - June 24, 2015

It’s okay not to judge on moral license but on the license to carry arms? Not very consistent.

Tantumblogo - June 24, 2015

Good point. One of many inconsistencies.

15. H-town - June 24, 2015

T-blogo: “Blanket condemnations like these lacking any distinction or apparent charity for those concerned have been the hallmark of this papacy….”

Amen, bro.


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: