Islamic “hijra” and the European immigration influx September 11, 2015Posted by Tantumblogo in abdication of duty, Basics, Christendom, disaster, Ecumenism, error, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, Immigration, sadness, self-serving, shocking, sickness, Society, the struggle for the Church.
1 Peter 5 has an interesting post from Andrew Bieszad on the ongoing immigration influx into Europe and the what it really constitutes. Bear in mind that the vast, vast majority of those flooding into Europe – not from Syria, but from all over the muslim “ummah” – are young, single men. Thus the concept of the “hizra,” or deliberate invasion of non-muslim territory, begins to make sense. Islam has always sought to occupy Rome as the last unconquered bastion of Christianity. Islam is convinced, collectively, that Rome falling to islam would mean the permanent crushing of the greatest obstacle to islam’s worldwide dominance: Christianity.
Much to ponder below:
In Islamic law and applied theology, the idea of the hijra pertains to the movement of a group of Muslims from a predominately Muslim area to a predominately non-Muslim area, with the goal of establishing Islam’s dominance in it. After Muhammad’s death, Muslims have counted two great hijras in the West. The first was the great Islamic expansion from 632 to 750, when Islamic armies conquered all of the territory from what is today central France to Uzbekistan. The second hijra included the Turkish migrations that resulted in the fall of Constantinople, and reached its zenith with Islamic armies besieging the gates of Vienna in 1683. It was during this last encounter that the horde was driven back by Polish Catholic forces into the Balkan Peninsula, breaking the strength of the Ottoman Empire.
The battle began on September 11th, 1683.
After the Battle of Vienna, European regimes began to rapidly colonize the Middle East, and the remains of the Ottoman Empire diminished, eventually being formally abolished by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in 1923 – but not before purging over a million Armenian, Assyrian, Pontic Greek, and Turkish Christians from its lands between 1915 and 1917. [And millions more later] Muslim “revivalists” beginning as early as the 18th century [when the wahhabist sect started] reminisced about a return to the practice of “orthodox” Islam, and posited that in so doing, they could bring about a revival of the same bestial force which conquered so much of the world and subjected so many countless peoples under Islam’s burdensome yoke. [muslim leadres and scholars openly discuss islam’s conceited belief that they should spread by violence/conquering. They love our ladies.] The first hijra conquered Jerusalem in 638. The second hijra conquered Constantinople in 1453. Two of the three oldest and holiest cities for Christians were conquered by Muslims. [Jerusalem was retaken by Christians from 1099-1187. And they didn’t even really try that hard.]
Except for Rome.
This, now, is the third hijra. According to certain voices in the Islamic world, it will be the final hijra, the one that will conquer Rome.
In Islamic circles, there has been a long-held belief that Christianity — and specifically, the Catholic Church — is the main obstacle impeding Islam’s domination of all humanity under one religious and political system. Therefore, in order to realize this vision, the Christian faithful must not only be converted to Islam, but their sacred spaces must be taken from them and given to the dar Al-Islam – “the house of Islam.” If the Islamic conquest of Jerusalem led to the end of Christianity as the dominant religion in the Holy Land, and the same was true in the Byzantine Empire with the fall of Constantinople, the conquest of Rome and the Islamization of St. Peter’s Basilica would mean the effective destruction of the Church worldwide, and its replacement with Islam. [Meh. I’m a bit skeptical about that. But on the path we’re on now, who knows?!? Would the fall of Rome to islam cause people to wake up from their sexular pagan materialist dream world, or would they prefer to keep their heads buried in the sand and/or submit provided they remained comfortable. But they wouldn’t remain comfortable for long, islam would not be able to even remotely manage the finely balanced, infinitely intricate global technological and economic construct that the world identifies with the West.]
I have written extensively about the Catholic faithful and Islam. I have constantly stressed that we must pray and make sacrifice for the souls of the Muslims, and must continue to do so. But as the example of the Church teaches clearly, despite the current reticence from our prelates, there are times when the Church’s members must fight in military combat against their enemies, not least of whom may be the armies of Ishmael. We did so before, and Europe was saved. If we are tested again and fail, many of our churches and faithful may fall under the cruel dominion of Islam. We are seeing this now in the areas dominated by the Islamic State. It is a reality that will only continue to spread if left unchecked.
There are two primary reasons for islam’s sudden resurgence, which would have been taken as a joke even 50 years ago: the vast amounts of wealth being transferred from the developed world to muslim energy producing states, which use some of those funds to spread islam around the world, and the moral enervation of the West. The latter could be easily offset and overcome, but the latter is the key factor. It is the prime reason for islam’s resurgence and for its successful penetration into Europe in vast numbers, as Europeans have sterilized, aborted, and contracepted themselves to the point of economic collapse without the importation of vast amounts of cheap labor. It is also the reason why the militarily, technologically, and economically superior West appears so unable to respond effectively to islam’s rise.
There is, in essence, no basis on which to respond. Liberalism/leftism may be a religion, but it is an empty, hollow one, that deep down even its most fervent adepts recognize. It rarely inspires in souls the kind of conviction that can lead to life-giving self-denial, at least not on the kind of scale needed to respond to the existential threat many feel islam represents. Only true religious conviction can inspire that kind of self-giving (islam certainly does so, but in a manner which is essentially opposite from the Christian sense). Thus, with the ongoing collapse of real Christian belief, the West is increasingly disarmed and unable to respond to this rising threat, except by abject surrender and endless posturing.
Just some random videos that may or may not have anything to do with the above:
Well, what do you know, a ripple launch of 4 Trident D-5 missiles.
The books say the CEP of a Mark 21 RV on a Minuteman III is 100 m (see towards the end). It looks more like about 10 to me.
An oldie but a goodie: