jump to navigation

Top Marine Sergeant trades rank for honesty September 22, 2015

Posted by Tantumblogo in abdication of duty, disaster, error, Flightline Friday, foolishness, paganism, rank stupidity, secularism, self-serving, sickness, Society, unbelievable BS.
trackback

As the Obama Administration destruction of the US military continues, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus has decreed that all combat positions shall be open to women. The Marines have stolidly resisted, and got Mabus to agree to a test to see how mixed-gender combat units performed compared to all-male units. The results were disastrous, with the even the very best women the Marine Corps has to offer – a truly picked group – equaling the performance of the bottom 5% of men in the Corps.  The mixed-gender unit performed more poorly in 70% of 139 tested categories and only out-performed the all-male unit in a handful of duties mostly related to record-keeping and other administrative tasks.  In spite of this result, Mabus has decreed that having women in combat is an unalloyed good that simply must happen, the results be damned.

A top Marine sergeant affiliated with the testing brutally summarized the failure of women to perform in the test, and will probably lose his stripes as a result. The military is increasingly not only no place for Christians, but for anyone of conscience:

A Marine hero blasted Navy Secretary Ray Mabus’ for claiming that Marines studying women in ground combat with the wrong mindset essentially caused women to drastically underperform in the gender integration experiment.

Sergeant Maj. Justin LeHew, senior enlisted adviser with Marine Corps Training and Education Command, the command in charge of the study, wrote a public post on Facebook saying that the Secretary’s comments were not only unfair to the women in the experiment, but run counter to national security interests.

“This was as stacked as a unit could get with the best Marines to give it a 100 percent success rate as we possibly could. End result? The best women in the GCEITF as a group in regard to infantry operations were equal or below in most all cases to the lowest 5 percent of men as a group in this test study.[No matter how much feminists refuse to admit it, women are not just men with different gonads. They are fundamentally different, much better suited to certain things, but much poorer at others, and no amount of political agitation or endless crying about “gender bias” is ever going to change that.  There are virtually no women who could single-handedly perform a one-person carry of an injured 200 lb comrade for hundreds of yards to safety.  That’s just one of hundreds of potential life-threatening scenarios where women simply do not have the physical characteristics to stand in combat. And what kind of society would want its women playing at soldier, anyway?]

They are slower on all accounts in almost every technical and tactical aspect and physically weaker in every aspect across the range of military operations. SECNAV has stated that he has made his mind up even before the release of these results and that the USMC test unit will not change his mind on anything.

Listen up folks. Your senior leadership of this country does not want to see America overwhelmingly succeed on the battlefield, it wants to ensure that everyone has an opportunity to pursue whatever they want regardless of the outcome on national security……

…… In regards to the infantry… There is no trophy for second place. You perform or die.

Make no mistake. In this realm, you want your fastest, most fit, most physical and most lethal person you can possibly put on the battlefield to overwhelm the enemy’s ability to counter what you are throwing at them and in every test case, that person has turned out to be a man. [Amazing the things we have to “learn” these days, isn’t it?  I mean, this is just fundamental common sense going back thousands of years, and now its “controversial.”  What is really controversial is the leftist demand that women and men are utterly equal in every respect, which is as asinine as it is destructive.]

There is nothing gender biased about this, it is what it is. You will never see a female Quarterback in the NFL, there will never be a female center on any NHL team and you will never see a female batting in the number 4 spot for the New York Yankees. It is what it is. As a country we preach equality.

But to place these mandates on the military before this country has even considered making females register, just like males, for the selective service is in all aspects out of touch with reality. Equality and equal opportunity start before you raise your right hand and swear and oath to this country.

Yes, we are an all volunteer force at the moment. Should this country however need to mobilize rapidly again to face the threats of the world like our grandfathers did, it will once again look to the military age males of this country to fill the ranks because last I checked, we did not require women to register for the selective service.

Until that happens, we should not even be wasting our time even thinking about opening up the infantry to women..

That’s a great point, and reveals a fundamental tenet of feminism that is often overlooked: it’s all about maximizing opportunities and options for women while simultaneously minimizing them for men.  That’s not the pretty rhetoric women put out in public, but as RS McCain has shown in over a year’s worth of detailed study of “hidden” feminist rhetoric that goes on in the “women’s studies” degree plans on campuses around this nation and within the feminist milieu, it’s really about female superiority and the attempted subjugation of men to a distinctly second-class role.  The most crazed feminists these days make no bones of their abject hatred for all men (as in, there are NO good men, it is impossible for a man to be good, etc) and their avowed lesbianism, either.  These women constitute the deranged but incredibly influential outer edge of the feminist movement, a movement that hides it real objectives and desires from the general populace while seeking to garner political influence to eventually enact their misanthropy in law.  This case of the Marine Corps is just one more adventure in that regard, the feminists calling for women in combat roles and influencing the Obamination to force this insanity on the military loathe the armed services and would never condescend to volunteer themselves, but they demand women unequal to the task be put in danger in order to satisfy the radfem’s unquenchable need for validation and ego-stroking.

Good men and women will unnecessarily die as a result, and this nation will offend God in yet another respect.  I say that because I do not believe the God of Armies wants to see women in combat (save in some kind of nightmare necessity).  One can easily envision the horrors that will result.  One direct and very certain consequence is that combat units will now experience huge shortfalls in their order of battle as women assigned to combat slots get medevaced out part way through their tour, either due to pregnancy (occurs to 30-40% of women on Navy ships) or inability to bear the load. That has already led to those left behind having to pull double-duty to make up the missing personnel.

It all makes me sick. I saw a video recently of an Air Force Security Policewoman performing security outside an ICBM silo in North Dakota. That woman little girl was probably 5’2″ and 220 lbs.  She couldn’t run 3 miles if her life depended on it.  What a total joke.

Comments

1. Margaret Costello - September 22, 2015

Agree. How many good young men will die because of this moronic junk? And how does wielding a weapon in open combat match the feminine characteristics of trust, surrender, receptivity, nurturing, support and consolation? Women are the ones to be protected not thrown into the battlefront. One more way we are trying to destroy men in this culture. My hope is that Traditional Catholic men will stand up and remind their fellows what a spine looks like, and that real women admire said spine:+) God bless~

2. tg - September 22, 2015

“little girl was probably 5’2″ and 220 lbs”. Not too little at 220. They have really lowered the standards if they allow obese women or men to enlist or stay in the military. I had a female friend who was in the reserves. However, she was a strong, tall female but she had to watch her weight constantly because she was afraid of being kicked out.

3. Obsever - September 22, 2015

Perhaps I’m looking at this the wrong way, but it is a real possibility in the near future the military will be used against patriots and Christians. We will have a better fighting chance if military personnel and elite units are inefficient and compromised by feminism.

Tantumblogo - September 22, 2015

They’d better start working on some better justifications than they have now, or get most of the fairly decent conservative type people entirely out of the military, because my reading of folks in the military now is that they are very anti-administration/gov’t, are cognizant of that potentiality, and would never go along with it. That, of course, could be a reason behind the ongoing purges of non-leftists and attempts to turn the military into a huggy-feely more leftist friendly place. But then your scenario would play out, you’d have a neutered, ineffectual, politicized military being turned on the American people (re: non-leftists).

4. c matt - September 23, 2015

I have always argued to any feminist that their claim for equal rights is a sham until women are also subject to registration for the draft. Glad to see at least someone in the military (for now) agrees.


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: