jump to navigation

US Military, RIP: 1775-2015 December 4, 2015

Posted by Tantumblogo in abdication of duty, disaster, error, foolishness, horror, scandals, secularism, self-serving, sickness, Society.
trackback

Well, we’ve had a good run. 240 years isn’t bad.  But now that the liberal physicist Ashton Carter has decreed that ALL military slots will be open to women, I think we can see the final nail being inserted into the coffin.  A coffin which has been pounded on by democrat administrations and liberal zeitgeist for the past 20+  years.

I cannot tell you how asinine this is.  The once proud US military is being reduced to day care center, jobs program for single women, and primary vehicle for leftist deconstruction of Western civilization.  All good people should leave the military now. If you’ve “enjoyed” mandatory monthly diversity training, get ready for weekly, even daily.  Get ready to see careers ruined for expediency because some diversity hire becomes aggrieved, or simply wants to attention.  Get ready for gallons of blood to be spilled as women wholly unqualified for combat slots are forced in under quota systems.

Because that’s how it has operated, and how it will operate.  If there are X percentage of women in the military, the feminists will demand that there be X percentage of women in combat slots.  How many of those women can hump a 100 lb load 25 miles over rough terrain, day after day?  How many can carry a 60 lb mortar baseplate 15 miles, or a tripod for a Ma Deuce?  How many can carry a 125 lb handy billy pump even one foot?  How many will create lucrative side jobs whoring themselves out to men in their units, and what effect will that have on morale?  Anyone have any idea how rampant that is in the Navy?  How much more money will now be spent creating cushy assignments for women in combat units, how many units will “deploy short” because Private Benjamin hurt her tootsie on march, how many more diversity officers will there be, further deflating morale and creating yet another budgetary morass?

That’s not to say that there are absolutely NO women who can do ANY combat assignment.  There are, a precious few, depending on the nature of the job in question. When it comes to land combat duty, the number of women who can truly meet the current standard for men is infinitesimal. But in order to satisfy the fantasies of feminists that men and women are wholly interchangeable in every possible way, yet another double standard will be created, with women being given multiple do-overs (and frequently simply being passed through) even the reduced by 2/3 standard of their male counterparts.

As for all you service chiefs who okayed this rather than resign……..you cowardly, cretinous bastards.  You worthless politicians in uniform.  This only shows how successful Obama has been in emasculating and politicizing the command structure.  It is at present almost totally broken.

We’re going to get our rears absolutely handed to us on some future battlefield.  And it won’t be very far in the future, either.

 

Comments

1. Angelic Doctor Games - December 4, 2015

“But, but, but the Israelis let their women serve in combat, right?!”

Tantumblogo - December 4, 2015

In reserve roles, primarily. And it’s a joke in Israel, too.

Angelic Doctor Games - December 4, 2015

Of that, I have no doubt. By the way, when did we as a Union switch from having separate state militias to a massive army of the Republic under the leadership of an emperor-in-chief? I think that the military as we moderns know has existed for a far shorter time than we are led to believe.

Tantumblogo - December 4, 2015

Depends on the service, doesn’t it? There’s been a Navy and Marine Corps since the Revolutionary War, and those were national level, not state. The Army was more militia based early on, forming up into national-level units in time of war. I think by the War of 1848, however, there was a permanent, national army in existence.

Angelic Doctor Games - December 4, 2015

All of which we were warned about by the anti-federalists whose dire predictions have all but come to pass.

2. M P P - December 4, 2015

It is the role of the male of the human species to protect and defend the female of the species as well as the children, innocent, and helpless. Women dying in combat leaving orphans behind…more sexual attacks on them, more PTSD among them, etc. Destroying the brotherhood in military units once so necessary but already weakened by sodomites. We are living at the end of our society.

3. Lynne - December 4, 2015

It’s kind of amazing the amount of damage he (Obama) has done in only 7 years. Kind of like Vatican II and the Church.

“The lamps are going out all over Europe, we shall not see them lit again in our life-time” British Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey may have remarked to a friend on the eve of Britain’s entry into the First World War. First published in Grey’s memoirs in 1925, the statement earned wide attention as a correct perception of the First World War and its geopolitical and cultural consequences. (source: wikipedia)

4. ursula - December 4, 2015

Tantumblogo, what are your thoughts as to whether this will lead to females being required to register for the draft?

Tantumblogo - December 4, 2015

Give. Me. A. Break. No, it’s a one way street – all rights and privileges are granted, with zero in the way of responsibilities. You will never see such hew and cry if some perspicacious Republican legislator takes this logic to its conclusion and proposes legislation requiring women to register for the draft. It will never happen.

c matt - December 4, 2015

The way it will happen is a male filing a discrimination lawsuit for having to register, while women, who are equally capable of combat roles, do not have to. Given that student aid, licenses and many other things are dependent upon being registered if male, I think he would have a pretty open and shut case. If nothing else, it would expose the sheer hypocrisy of it all, not that anyone in the Eunuch States of America would care.

5. Xopher - December 4, 2015

Diversity Officer = “Equal Opportunity” Officer = Zampolit?

6. Don - December 4, 2015

One hope is a Republican wins in November 2016, and one of his first acts after being sworn in on January 20, 2017 is to countermand this nonsense. Now some may not, being fools themselves. But a few will.

7. David - December 4, 2015

Here’s some history: When female firefighters were coming on board (1980), the largest objection came from firefighters wives. Many wives worried that if their husband got trapped, could a female rescue them safely? While some can (and I personally know some who are definitely capable), other women just don’t have the strength.

I hope several naval officers from O-3 up to O-6 put up some resistance if they are submariners. Submarines need privacy, and the crews work six on and six off. While I could see a female serving in logistics, public affairs, or meteorology, I don’t know why a woman would consider serving on a submarine.

8. daisy - December 5, 2015

On the other hand, a lot of girls will get killed and although it will be covered up it just may cause a huge drop in female enlistment.

9. Michael Minnis - December 7, 2015

That men are no longer perceived as protectors of women but “equal” army members is one of the many signs that our culture is reaching the bottom. With abortion on demand and women running the military, we will soon have no one to defend us just as babies in the womb often have no one to defend them not even their own mother.


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: