jump to navigation

A Couple of Notes on the Transgender Agenda – Including, My Mom’s Encounter with a Man in the Lady’s Room August 25, 2016

Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, disaster, error, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, persecution, Revolution, scandals, secularism, self-serving, sexual depravity, sickness, Society, unbelievable BS.
trackback

So my mom went to the movie theater last weekend.  As a form of entertainment, I don’t generally recommend it, but you know parents these days, they just refuse to listen.

After the movie, my mom availed herself of the women’s restroom, as you tend to do, and encountered in there a 6′ man – dressed entirely as a male, with not even an attempt to appear female – standing, urinating in a stall with the door wide open. Now, my mom is a 4’11” Norwegian woman, and my 6′ 3″ dad was not around.  My mom stood outside the entrance, while another woman went in, and then came right back out.

“Is that a man in the lady’s room?”, she asked?  “Yes, I think it is.”

An usher was around and they told him of the situation, and the teenager looked as if his worst nightmare had just come true. But before he had to figure out what to do, the man came out – apologized, for some reason – and then went on his way.

You can imagine how eager I am to take my 6 daughters to the movies at this point.

What can I say?  This is what a satanic culture looks like.  That man, generally speaking, has the weight of the law on his side.  If someone took severe exception to his presence in the woman’s room when, say, his wife was in there, it would be the invading man who the law would probably tend to support.  That’s arguable perhaps at present, but if Obama and the sexular pagans have their way, it won’t be for long.

Which, speaking of, a lawsuit has been filed by doctors and several states against the Obama Administration for its demand that doctors perform sex reassignment surgery genital mutilation whether they think it is medically called for, or not.  Basically, if a sick and wounded soul desires to have their bodies permanently mutilated and their reproductive capacity destroyed, the Obama admin says doctors have to do it, no matter how counterindicated such irreversible procedures may be, because transgender bathroom something something.  No, seriously:

Five states and a group of religiously-affiliated hospitals and physicians are suing the Obama administration over a federal mandate that forces doctors to perform gender transition procedures on adults and children against their medical judgment.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in a Texas federal court, attempts to roll back a rule imposed by the Department of Health and Human Services in May that expanded the interpretation of “sex” under the Affordable Care Act to include “gender identity.”

In doing so, the Obama administration added transgender people to the list of protected classes under the Affordable Care Act, which states that individuals can’t be denied certain federally-funded health benefits because of their “race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.”

The move was part of a broader push by President Barack Obama to further transgender rights in the U.S[pander to an unbelievably small minority that has equally unbelievably become one of the most powerful special interest groups in the country over the past 18 months].

The implications of the HHS mandate are broad. By its own estimates,HHS said the rule would “likely cover almost all licensed physicians because they accept federal financial assistance.”…….

………The lawsuit challenging the HHS mandate was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, which is the same court thattemporarily blocked the Obama administration’s bathroom mandate on Sunday. In putting a halt to the policy that mandates public schools must open their restrooms, locker rooms, and showers to transgender students based on their gender identity instead of their biological sex, U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor argued the administration overstepped its authority.

When HHS issued the new gender identity rule on May 18, the agency cited as authority the Obama administration’s bathroom mandate, whose legitimacy is now in question.

That’s circular logic if I’ve ever seen it – issue an unprecedented, unconstitutional, unpopular rule – which has the effect of a law, but never passed Congress, nor was even debated – and then cite that rule in expanding the unpopular policy further and further.  The idea that doctors must perform totally voluntary, irreversible and incredibly destructive procedures against their will and medical judgment is incredibly offensive, and would never be tolerated – if it weren’t for the fact that the procedures in question are parts of the sexular pagan agenda and thus amount to a literal religious belief that can never be questioned or opposed. This is part and parcel for the sexular pagan left, which has similarly elevated other medical acts – provision of contraception (even to celibate religious), abortion, sterilization, etc – to the level of sacred shibboleth.

Note the mechanism by which doctors are forced to perform these procedures is their acceptance of federal funds, I guess through remittances for Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.  No wonder more and more doctors are refusing to accept patients covered by government-sponsored health plans.

Enjoy your brave new trans-world.  Leftists may laugh, but how long before refusing the advances of a sodomite or transsexual is taken as prima facie evidence of bigotry and is persecuted by the Leviathan state?

I would not argue it could never happen.

Comments

1. c matt - August 25, 2016

If it is in the Northern District, it may still be the same “court” but that does not mean it will get the same judge. Each District has several judges. So it may not get the same outcome as the other mandate (not sufficiently familiar with the Northern District to know which judges are favorable/unfavorable)

2. tg - August 25, 2016

I had an experience at a department store. I was in the restroom stall so I couldn’t see anything – just hear. I heard a woman say “this is the ladies restroom” in a very firm voice to apparently a male. He apologized and left. I wondered if he was testing the waters or if he really went in there by accident.

3. Faith of Our Fathers - August 25, 2016

There’s a TV program over here in U.K called Embarresing Bodies where on such a show the Doctors of which 4 present it 2 are Homosexual. Anyhow on one program there was a Man who was going through the full bunna I.E all of the hormone drugs had been taken and all that was left was off with the Knackers then of course the Doctor told a lie and said he would be a woman. I couldn’t believe the way this Homosexual Doctor was telling this guy how they would create Woman’s sexual organs on this man,it was as if he were sitting having a haircut. The Doctor said that after so called procedure he would then be able to have sex as a normal woman. The mind really boggles when you hear so called highly educated people come away with such rubbish.

4. Extraordinary Absent Minded - August 26, 2016

Some men are extraordinarily absent minded and have been known to use women’s restrooms from time to time. It’s something these men need to be extra careful of these days . . .

*Extraordinarily* Absent Minded - August 26, 2016

They also tend to make simple spelling errors.

Tantumblogo - August 29, 2016

Considered. I have once or twice inadvertantly started heading into a woman’s room, but didn’t get past the door before I realized something was very wrong. I could not imagine somehow missing the absence of urinals and the other accouterments that plainly establish the difference between male and female restrooms, but I suppose it could happen.

5. Kathleen - August 27, 2016

I’ve been slogging through this world for over a half a century and have yet to run into a man (pre-Obama) in the Ladies Room.

There is NO urinal. Big, immediate wake up.

So, returning to the subject at hand.

My heart just breaks for anyone with children from here forward. It’s horrifying beyond words.

It is an open license for all the perverts.

And now they’re the protected class.

Both little girls and little boys will suffer because of this. Because all the perverts will be using the opportunities created by this.

And then there are the innocent young women.

INNOCENCE must be protected. To fail to do so is to offend GOD.

Arise O Lord and let Thy enemies be scattered!

Let them who hate Thee fly before they face!


Sorry comments are closed for this entry

%d bloggers like this: