jump to navigation

Reason #945 to Never Serve in the US Military……. September 19, 2016

Posted by Tantumblogo in asshatery, Basics, disaster, error, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, paganism, persecution.
trackback

……..or strongly consider terminating service at the earliest possible/foreseeable date.  The Navy, acting on Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter’s act of the will permitting “transgender” individuals to serve in the armed forces, is implementing across-the-board training indoctrination for all servicemembers starting next year.  Aside from encouraging deeply disordered individuals from maintaining a fiction in total contradiction to their God-given identity, aside from allowing burly men free access to women’s restrooms and other facilities on ship, it will also, almost certainly, require all Naval personnel to join in with this fantasy by mandating the use of one’s “gender pronoun of choice,” or even ludicrous made up ones like xer, zim, xhe, etc.  This is institution-mandated madness, and, in line with the Gramscian principles at work in all cultural marxism of this type, will help serve as both a massively useful legal precedent for imposing this unprecedented social engineering on unwilling states and even private entities, and as a further wrench in the already broken down machine of Western civilization.

As you can see, it’s win-win to the leftists who are attempting to foist this insanity on all of us:

An all-Navy message sent out Tuesday says that all sailors will be required to undergo transgender behavioral education by July 2017.

Starting Nov. 1, the training will educate sailors about the Navy’s new transgender policy that allows transgenders to serve in the military, Military.com reported.

“This training will emphasize policies and expectations of personal behavior,” the message states. [Meaning, if you call a 6’5″ 250 lb dude covered in thick body hair who happens to wear a wig – or not even that, who happens to feel like a woman, today, even though he gives absolutely no outward indication of being such – “sir,” you’re finished.]

……In the meantime, leadership is putting together a commander’s tool kit that will guide training, said Lt. Jessica Anderson, a spokeswoman for Naval Personnel Command, to Military.com[The fact that a woman is spokesman for this is hardly surprising.  Of all the services, none have been more a special target of cultural marxism than the Navy, whose “Tailhook scandal” gave the powers that be all the excuse they needed to break yet another cultural institution of any outward masculine orientation]

Service members are expected to maintain standards of conduct and treat each other with dignity and respect,” Anderson said. [This is a euphemism of language policing on an unprecedented scale] “Training for sailors will be conducted by command triads via mobile training teams or DVD with a facilitation guide if the unit is in a remote area and unable to receive face-to-face training. There will also be webinars for COs to ask questions prior to delivering training to their commands.” [If you had any idea how much time in today’s military is taken up by training of this type, and similar inanities (like ubiquitous commercials on Armed Forces TV demanding service members constantly wear reflector belts even when on duty in a war zone), you’d be amazed that anything productive ever gets accomplished.]

The training deadline is set to coincide with the date that the Navy will start accepting transgender recruits, July 1, 2017.

The military is creating ground rules for servicemembers who want to change their gender while serving and is requiring that all transgendered people use the bathroom associated with their preferred gender.

Anderson said that leadership will crack down on any mistreatment or harassment of transgender individuals. [Which would include telling someone who is manifestly a man, that they are not, in fact, a woman, no matter how many cancer-causing drugs they take, or how much self-mutilation they perform. Even use of the “wrong” pronoun will be grounds for severe penalties, because you will be made to care, and to sing the leftist tune.]

Secretary of Defense Ash Carter repealed the ban on transgenders serving in the military back in June.

“This is the right thing to do for our people and for the force,” Carter said at a Pentagonpress conference. “We can’t allow barriers unrelated to a person’s qualifications prevent us from recruiting and retaining those who can best accomplish the mission.”

What complete, utter bullshwaggle.  Transgenders don’t even make up 0.03% of the population.  The military has gotten by without them for 240 years, and could continue getting by forever without these super-special snowflakes.  This is all about an exercise of naked power by cultural marxists to advance the ball as far as they possibly can while they still hold power.

Do you have any idea how high the same sex rape rate is in the US military? Did you know that men are almost as likely to be raped in the US military as are women?

And you do, of course, realize, that this whole transgender rights line of attack on morality and decency is, a) something that was on absolutely no one’s radar even 2 years ago, before Obergefell, and b) is a direct result of that decision, which suddenly gave those inclined to sodomy and allied perversion not only “equal” rights but, given all the pre-existing “hate crimes” legislation and other special government protections, superior rights to the most hated creature in the known universe, the always deplorable white male?

The Left worked to set the table for that decision for at least twenty five years solid, and once it came, had an entire panoply of causes to put forth to continue their attack on their real enemy, Christianity.  We’re bogged down in bathroom wars over an aggrieved 50,000 or so very, very loud people, nationwide, so that almost no one gives thought to, say, rolling back Obergefell, Lawrence v. Texas, etc.  That’s how the Left has succeeded for 60 odd years now, they never rest, as soon as one objective is obtained, they push for 5 more.

So, Catholic Navy types (and, I assume, those of all the other branches)…….are you going to go along and call a giant he “Ma’am,” or whatever is demanded of you?  Or will there be an appropriate weasel word provided, something sexless so you don’t have to compromise yourself totally?  Like just addressing people by rank?  But hasn’t going along to get along helped bring us to this very point?  Not that I would have the wherewithal to do any differently if it were my career on the line………..or would I?

I have gone out in a blaze of glory once.  There’s no way I could ever work at Fuji-land again so long as current management remains, not that I’d want to.

h/t reader TT

Comments»

1. Baseballmom - September 19, 2016

Put a fork in it… We are done…

2. Rex - September 19, 2016

Time to create The Catholic Army of the United States of America and stop serving at the masonic military forces.

3. Dymphna - September 19, 2016

Every Christian should leave as soon as possible. Let’s see the SJWs win a war on their own.

4. The Lord's Blog - September 20, 2016

Question: DO YOU THINK OUR MILITARY WILL BE THE LAUGHINGSTOCK OF THE RUSSIANS?

Camper - September 20, 2016

According to an SSPXer in the US Army I know, right now it already is. Their fighter jets and tanks are better.

The Lord's Blog - September 20, 2016

Humbly thought so. Thanks for he info. Speaking of SSPXer I predict someday toward the end (As have a few of the Saints.) after the man of sin shows that there will be a very strict order helping in the world to be a beacon of light in the as yet bold darkness to come. I wonder about it being this SSPX order or something similar. Get the word out to everybody on this. Its probably our own people in government undermining everything. We know about princes of this world and powers etc. Always need to be watched to. God Bless.

Camper - September 20, 2016

In fact, my amigo in the army says that some institute/person in Australia annually runs war games between America and Russia and that Russia blows America away every time.

What I’d like to see though in America if Trump is elected are dramatic cuts in government spending, not a boost to military spending. If this country doesn’t get its fiscal house in order, we are done for.

Tantumblogo - September 20, 2016

Camper, either you, or your friend, are dreaming. Sure, there are circumstances where fighting Russia could be very tough, such as the Baltics or the Ukraine, which is in their backyard and the US would have a terrible logistics pipeline to enact and defend, but that pipeline is coming into being more and more every day (with far more powerful forces being deployed on Russia’s doorstep), and even then, Russia would have to hope for a quick victory and resolution with a weak US leadership. Any protacted war and they’d be toast.

The Russians is almost entirely a full generation behind the US in capability. They have almost no PGMs. Even in Syria, their signature involvement, they have to rely almost entirely on free-fall weapons of dubious effectiveness. Their military is far smaller than US. Their troops are generally considered to be far more poorly trained and led, as they still rely largely on a conscript army. A huge swath of the US military has recent and extensive combat experience, whereas only limited parts of the Russian armed forces have any (though, this is changing with ongoing deployments).

I could easily draft a scenario where the US/NATO would be hard-pressed to defeat a well-planned and coordinated Russian attack that was able to build up in secret (which would be key, otherwise, dead), but those scenarios would be very limited.

Never trust anyone who says: “Well, we ran a war game and Russia just creamed the US, China takes Japan” or whatever. Always ask what were the circumstances, who crafted the war game, to what end, what was being evaluated, etc., etc. Otherwise, it means nothing, other than to help support a pre-existing bias, perhaps.

Camper - September 22, 2016

I don’t know what the circumstances were, but I don’t know what to think now because I’ve heard that their stuff is better and that our stuff is better.

Camper - September 22, 2016

Also, Russia’s debt to GDP ratio is very small compared to ours. It’s hard to imagine Russia and the US fighting over anything, but there is a reason that Jim Rogers is bullish on the ruble.

Tantumblogo - September 20, 2016

See other reply. I pray it never comes to that. There are really far more reasons for the US and Russia to be great friends than enemies, but the powers that be seem to insist on the latter.

Generally speaking, Russia would be hard pressed, but in some cases, could eke out a win. Of course, give the wussification of the US military another 5-10 years, and all bets are off.

The Lord's Blog - September 20, 2016

Hope I never comes down to them and us. God Bless. In agreement with you.

5. The Lord's Blog - September 20, 2016

Reblogged this on Jean'sBistro2010's Blog and commented:
Awesome article.

6. The Lord's Blog - September 20, 2016

Our culture in America is going toward fracture.

7. Blaine - September 20, 2016

You have no idea what this is doing to me. It’s like a bad dream. I love the Navy. It’s all I ever wanted to do. It probably has to end. Could/would a President Trump reverse this? I’m not sure but it’s my last hope. And I probably can’t still stomach a vote for the guy.

Tim - September 20, 2016

Stomach it
You’re certain what will happen if Hillary wins.
Now that’s impossible to stomach.

Tantumblogo - September 20, 2016

I know it’s so hard on you especially. Sorry bro.

8. thatwomaninthelibary - September 20, 2016

Blaine, are you any where near retirement? I read a letter by someone who is getting out after 15 years. He can’t stomach what’s going on anymore and his family and friends are not supportive.

Blaine - September 20, 2016

I’ve got 8 left to a reserve retirement. I’m off active duty. Benefit I care about really is G.I. Bill transferability which would occur in late 2018 for me I don’t care about retirement.

Tim, Trump isn’t an option either. I won’t vote for evil just to stem greater evil.

Tim - September 20, 2016

Then get used to “Madame” President.

Blaine - September 21, 2016

As if the person who counts the votes (a machine now) hasn’t determined that already, bud. You actually believe there’s a choice in that matter? After all she’s gotten away with already?

Tim - September 21, 2016

My name isn’t “bud”. Please be respectful even if we disagree. Thank you. If it’s all fixed(which I believe is possible) then why vote in any election or even express an opinion on any candidate?

Blaine - September 21, 2016

Excuse me, Tim. While I meant no disrespect at all, I won’t have a conversation with someone so easily offended by a common, benign word in the vein of dude, man, etc. good day to you sir.

Tim - September 21, 2016

I’m not offended, I just think it poor manners when you know my name already. Anyway, just saw this and found it an interesting theory:

http://www.churchmilitant.com/video/episode/vortex-donald-constantine-trump?mc_cid=ff470bbf25&mc_eid=d3e68a645f

God Bless you Blaine.

Tantumblogo - September 20, 2016

Ah Blaine you shame me. I was there, unwilling to vote for any of the alternatives proffered, but I’ve fallen into deciding I’ll probably vote for Trump by default, hoping against hope he’ll turn out closer to his recent rhetoric than his lifetime beliefs.

Tim - September 21, 2016

There’s no shame, eventually the reality of reality comes home to roost.

Blaine - September 21, 2016

I was actually where you’re at, but this latest news about using charity money to pay his for-profits’ legal expenses is just despicable if true.

While I agree with his nationalistic leanings, I don’t for a second trust the man. His morals are in shambles as evidenced by his life and the things he says (he doesn’t trust college age kids who are into chastity, for one). He has always supported abortion, until he supposedly recently doesn’t. He’s got no military experience much like his opponent and I won’t vote for someone to be Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of these United States who hasn’t spent a day in uniform.

As far as the Supreme Court argument – Justice Kennedy is a Catholic nominated by President Reagan. Any questions?

It doesn’t matter in the end, America had a good run but either one is a quickening towards the end. I’m putting my faith in the Lord and sitting this one out (voting for Castle).

Essentially, I’m with Mercutio – a plague on both their houses.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: