Archbishop Lenga – Francis an “usurper……..heretic” March 3, 2020
Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, episcopate, fightback, Francis, General Catholic, Grace, manhood, shocking, Society, the struggle for the Church, Tradition, true leadership, Virtue.comments closed
I know this dates from about 10 days ago, but I haven’t commented on it, so it can’t be said to have been done (watch out for the evangelical trolls in the comments at the link – don’t they know that evangelical protestantism is dead, the millenials totally abandoned their WWJD bracelets for bi-curious lifestyles and diabolical social media narcissm?).
So what’s my comment to retired Archbishop Pawel Lenga calling Francis an usurper and a heretic? If the shoe fits………..and those look like 9 1/2s to me.
I’ll throw in a bit more commentary as we go along:
Catholic Archbishop Jan Lenga, the former head of the Diocese of Karaganda, Khazakhstan and now retired in Poland, was ordered to stop delivering sermons and speaking with the media because of his frequent statements that Pope Francis is a “heretic” spreading “untruths and sins” and “leading the world astray.” [check, check, and double check?]
Archbishop Lenga has rejected the order to be silent, issued this month by Polish Bishop Wieslaw Mering, because no one in the Polish church apparently has the authority to silence him [because he apparently belongs to a religious order of papal right? I’m not sure on the circumstances]
Lenga belongs to a religious order, the Congregation of Marians of the Immaculate Conception, and is living as a guest of the order in Lichen, Poland. He reportedly is only subject to an order from the Pope.
“Christ gave me authority through the church to proclaim the truth, and I’ll do so as long as I live,” said Lenga, 69, as reported by Crux.com. “I won’t yield to degradation by those whose own statements and actions are entangled with heresy and sectarianism.”
“What right do they have to recall what pertains to the church when they themselves have never upheld it?” he said. [Wow. Preach it, brother. I guess Lenga is apparently the honeybadger archbishop, because he don’t give a —-. That, and everything he says is true about all but perhaps 5% of bishops, and I’m being generous]
In a Feb. 25 interview with Gloria TV, Archbishop Lenga said his critics should “form their own church, rather than usurping power in the Catholic Church.” [But that’s not how the Left works. As Iowahawk brilliantly established several years ago, the Left works by invading a healthy organization, infecting it with Leftism like a virus, killing it from the inside out, and then parading around in its desiccated husk demanding respect. The Left will continue to occupy and attempt to destroy the human element of the Church so long as it perceives the Church as having any cultural cache and ability to influence people to its ends. Once the Church or any other organization has been destroyed to the point of uselessness, the Left will then, sometimes, depart. But sometimes they leave agents behind to make sure it can never resurrect to become a threat. The Left is an endlessly jealous religion that brooks no competition whatsoever. Thus, our choice is, drive them out by hook or crook, or see the human element of Holy Mother Church essentially destroyed.]
Archbishop Lenga has “co-signed several letters urging Pope Francis to clarify marriage and family teachings after the pope’s 2016 encyclical ‘Amoris Laetitia,'” reported Crux.com. “He also signed a May 2019 ‘Declaration of Truths‘ alongside U.S. Cardinal Raymond Burke.”…….[and many other worthy Churchmen and laity]
…….. In a book-length interview on YouTube, Archbishop Lenga said he still recognizes Benedict XVI as the Pope; Benedict resigned in February 2013, the first pope to do so in nearly 600 years. Lenga also stated he does not include the name of the “usurper and heretic” Francis in his Mass prayer intentions. [I’m not real hung up on whether Francis is the “real” pope or not. We could argue forever and none of us are going to make the call, unless there is a future Pius XIII among the readers, in which case, hook me up when you get to Rome!! The fact is, Francis has the title and the position and virtually everyone responds to his authority, so he is, for all practical purposes, the pope. I read the book about Benedict still being kind of a pseudo-pope, and I wasn’t exactly convinced. I believe he is the Pope, just the worst one ever – but only so far. His successor may be even worse. The fact that Benedict has stubbornly refused to die (thank you, God!) has prevented Francis from enacting many of the travesties he has desired to enact, just as PBXVI and Cardinal Sarah very adroitly and effectively cut the knees off of the “Amazonian synod” (sponsored and wholly funded by the German episcopal conference, which will say or do anything to keep that sweet, sweet church tax money coming)]
“Bergoglio [Pope Francis] has not confirmed himself in the faith and is not passing that faith to others, he is leading the world astray,” said Archbishop Lenga, as reported in The Tablet. “He proclaims untruths and sins, not the tradition which has endured for 2000 years.”
“He proclaims the truth of this world, which is precisely the truth the Devil,” said the archbishop. [Well that’s pretty harsh, but it is also not untrue. However, playing devil’s advocate since he was brought up, could not the same be said, to varying degrees, about the past 5 predecessors of Francis? What was Paul VI’s laying aside of the papal tiara, and declaring the Church ready to submit to the “wisdom” of the United Nations?]
In a Jan. 20 interview on Polish television, according to Crux.com, Archbishop Lenga “said ‘many bishops and cardinals’ lacked a ‘deep faith’ and had adopted ‘an attitude of betrayal and destruction’ by seeking to ‘correct Christ’s teaching,’ adding that current confusion in the church indicated ‘the Antichrist is here.'” [Wow, as I said, he’s really the honeybadger archbishop, but the Church desperately needs men willing to speak the Truth, and the whole Truth, unadulterated and without infection by Leftism or sops to the world and its lies and evils. Francis’ predecessors have been less direct counters to the Truth of Jesus Christ than weak men more afraid of offending the world than God. Francis is the first pontiff to directly attack and undermine the Doctrine of the Faith in a direct, deliberate, and systematic way. That is why comparisons between Francis and amoral “Renaissance popes” or the horrid men who occupied the office in the 800-900s is non sequitur and facile. Those men may have been personally immoral, but they never attacked the Doctrine of the Faith in a consistent and systematic manner, as Francis has done. Indeed, some of them defended the Faith heroically, at times. We have to come to the sad, heart-breaking realization that man is actually a fervently religious man, just one who worships a different religion and a false god. Indeed, he is using his ill-gotten office to proselytize – which means to aggressively promote a religion, or even shove a belief down the throat of another – for his false religion. He doesn’t mind proselytism at all, he just hates Catholics proselytizing, as he recognizes it as a threat to his own religion.]
I could go on, but I’ll stop. In short, Francis is a very, very bad man, but he was also inevitable, given that the vast majority of Catholics today are adherents to the religion of secular/materialist modernism, which is just another variant of Leftism, especially within the clergy and episcopate. Add to that most national episcopates being wholly addicted to government money, and it was actually a great blessing of God that we didn’t have a Francis or worse much sooner, before the traditional resistance had developed some cohesion and, I think and pray, momentum.
God bless Archbishop Lenga! I don’t know if he’s a bit too strong in his language and assessments but the Church desperately needs much more clarity and leadership right now.
Praise the Lord! Hardy Souls Toss Pagan Idol “Pachamama” Installed in Vatican Church into the Tiber – UPDATED October 21, 2019
Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, error, fightback, Francis, General Catholic, manhood, Restoration, Revolution, the struggle for the Church, Tradition, true leadership, Victory, Virtue.comments closed
[UPDATE at bottom. The men who removed the offensive statues have issued a statement to Life Site News.
My only criticism, is that they should have smashed them first. Those idols are long and thin, made of wood. Even an exotic Amazonian hardwood like bloodwood should have been breakable, but, hey, I’ll shut up. These two guys are heroes. I don’t want to hear about theft or sin, this was an unbearable offense against God and Holy Mother Church and had to come to precisely this end, just as some good University of Dallas (UD) students stole a blasphemous depiction of Our Blessed Mother from a horrid art exhibit that occurred about a decade ago, when former diocesan and university administration tried turning UD from a generally solidly Catholic college – as intended and founded by good Bishop Gorman, RIP – into something much more worldly, leftist, and fallen. Fortunately, they mostly failed, though some harm was done to the university and its reputation (full disclosure, my daughter attends UD).
But I demure. First, the video of the heroic act, then, some commentary by Taylor Marshall, who I had the pleasure of speaking with yesterday after the beautiful Pontifical High Mass at Mater Dei:
Now, some commentary from Dr. Taylor Marshall, who gives some historical context for this act, which is in the tradition of many saintly defenders of the Faith. In fact, destroying false idols has constantly been a hallmark of stalwart defenders of the Faith for centuries. It is only of this time of unprecedented heresy, blasphemy, cultural rot and institutional decay within the Church that such ridiculous acts like installing pagan idols in Catholic parishes would not be met with an instant fury of righteous indignation and immediate concrete acts to remove the offending idols. An act like this required great resevoirs of the masculine virtues, and in spite of the calamitous collapse of such virtues among men particularly and all souls generally in the past 200 years or so, it is extremely gratifying to know that some men still possess them. I am extremely heartened that, after 2 weeks, some hardy souls (finally?) acted:
Say a prayer for these good men, as Marshall did. I have not seen a formal reaction from Rome, but I wouldn’t be surprised if there is not an ongoing attempt to identify them and perse-prosecute them.
David Rodriguez is in Rome right now for The Fatima Center, and I had actually suggested to him that he go and take care of this ugly business, but I don’t believe David was involved in any way. I’m sure he wasn’t. Yep. Absolutely sure. No doubt about it.
Speaking of DR and The Fatima Center, Fr. Isaac Mary Relyea calls on Francis to convert and become Catholic below. I can’t say I disagree with that in any way. What that means, theologically and ecclesiastically, I have no idea, but I don’t disagree with the sentiment at all:
[UPDATE]: The statement from the heroes, via Life Site News:
“This was done for only one reason: Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, his Blessed Mother, and everybody who follows Christ, are being attacked by members of our own Church. We do not accept this! We do not longer stay silent! We start to act NOW!
Because we love humanity, we cannot accept that people of a certain region should not get baptized and therefore are being denied entrance into heaven. It is our duty to follow the words of God, like our holy Mother did. There is not second way of salvation.
Christus vincit, Christus regnat, Christus imperat!
Reads like this was a translation or that these guys are not native English speakers. It makes no difference, may God be with them. Dominus vobiscum!
Diocese News: Good Father Paul Weinberger Reassigned from St. William in Greenville to St. Monica in Dallas [UPDATED] September 6, 2019
Posted by Tantumblogo in Dallas Diocese, General Catholic, Holy suffering, Latin Mass, Liturgy, manhood, priests, Restoration, sanctity, Tradition, Virtue.comments closed
[UPDATE: COMMENTS CLOSED. You people know I have your e-mails and IPs, right? It’s kind of obvious when you all use the same one. This campaign of character assassination will not be permitted to continue.]
This is one of those sad/happy, good news-bad news kinda things. Good local priest Father Paul Weinberger (as to the good, you can find several instances of this by searching his name on this blog) has been reassigned from his role as pastor of St. William parish in Greenville, on the periphery of the Diocese, to St. Monica parish in north Dallas. I just spoke with Father Weinberger, and he advises that he will be priest in residence at Saint Monica, and will serve publicly there offering Mass and Confession, but only after a period of personal time in which he takes care of some long-delayed matters related to the estates of his deceased parents.
I say this is good news/bad news because it is bittersweet anytime a priest is reassigned, especially one that had been so long at one parish as Father Weinberger had. He had been at St. William about 18 years and had expressed hopes of serving there for the rest of his priestly ministry. In that time, many families had moved to the Greenville area to enjoy both a more rural manner of living and to take advantage of Father Weinberger’s very solid catechesis, reverent liturgy, and abundant Confession. Obviously many of those people are very sad to see Father Weinberger go. Father Weinberger is being replaced by one of the Diocese’s younger priests, Father Edwin Leonard.
But now, Father Weinberger is moving on to St. Monica, a centrally located and well known parish, where many more souls may take advantage of his gifts. I’m certain he will be well received. Whether Father Weinberger will be offering Latin Mass at St. Monica or publicly performing other devotions such as the nightly Rosary processions and frequent confessions is not known at this time (uh, because I forgot to ask).
Our family attended St. William for several years before eventually, and not without some sadness, moving on to Mater Dei and the full time Traditional Latin Mass. We have missed Father Weinberger over the years and look forward to being able to see him again, now that he is much closer to Irving. It was a nearly hour to drive out to Greenville, now he’ll only be about 15 minutes away.
Please pray for Father Weinberger and the parishioners of St. William. Losing a long time beloved priest can be very painful. I understand that at least some of the families will be traveling to Mater Dei on Sundays, so you Mater Dei readers be on the lookout for new faces (I know……..which ones?)! I will provide updates on Father Weinberger and his service at St. Monica as they become available.
Father Michael Rodriguez – Is It Acceptable for Catholics to Assist at the Novus Ordo……..? April 8, 2019
Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, catachesis, Father Rodriguez, fightback, General Catholic, Glory, Grace, Latin Mass, Liturgy, manhood, Restoration, Spiritual Warfare, SSPX, Tradition, true leadership, Virtue.comments closed
………and is it acceptable to assist at the SSPX if that is their only alternative? Interestingly,, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski of Wyoming Catholic College, among many others, agrees with the latter conclusion regarding the SSPX, that yes it is acceptable/licit (the question of validity having long ago been settled) to assist at the SSPX, particularly when one is faced with a liturgical desert in a particular locale.. I agree with both good men, and I’m very grateful that the SSPX is around in this current climate.
Now, I personally feel increasingly strongly that one should assist at the TLM if one is reasonably available. Of course, the definition of reasonable availability will vary from person to person. But I would also add that not all Novus Ordo Masses are the same. While they are exceedingly rare, rarer, in many cases, than the TLM, very reverently offered Novus Ordo Masses with priests who are solidly catechized and who promote the solemn Doctrine of the Faith to the utmost of their ability are to me an exception to this general guideline. I do have a personal bias, however, in that just such a Mass and priest played a pivotal role in my family finding its way to the TLM. That priest continues to serve and do very much good. Other viable options are reverent Eastern Rite Masses and the like. There is a quite worthy option in the Irving area in St. Basil’s.
Finally, I’m sure SSPX partisans may take exception to framing of Kwasniewski’s post, making an argument that the SSPX is okay in certain conditions. I know many folks fully believe that the situation is quite the opposite, with the SSPX being entirely justified and association with it being really the default option. I get where you’re coming from. But rather than taking exception for Kwasniewski failing to evaluate the SSPX’s status as you might prefer, consider how far the situation has come in just the past few years, where now mainstream conservative Catholic sites are proclaiming it just fine to assist at an SSPX Mass for the Sacraments in the vast majority of cases (because a liturgical and doctrinal wasteland full of abuse and outright evil is exactly what most people face in this tragic time in Church history).
Anyway, Father Michael Rodriguez below, along with Father Isaac Mary Relyea, answering a number of questions at a recent Catholic conference. You’ll take this short post, and you’ll like it!
Extraordinary Talk on Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus by Fr. Isaac Mary Relyea April 2, 2019
Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, catachesis, Christendom, fightback, Four Last Things, General Catholic, Glory, Grace, Latin Mass, manhood, priests, religious, sanctity, Society, Spiritual Warfare, Tradition, true leadership, Virtue.comments closed
I really like Father Isaac Mary Relyea, and here he delivers an exceedingly entertaining and watchable 80 minute talk on perhaps the most neglected, misunderstood, and deliberately ignored doctrine in modern Church life, Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus (EENS), or there is no salvation outside the Church. Father approaches the topic from its innumerable and unprecedentedly strong supports in the history of dogmatic theology, but also from a profoundly practical and pastoral -in the true sense of the word – standpoint.
Many faithful Catholics today have family members who are outside visible communion with Holy Mother Church. The doctrine of EENS causes those of us with most or all of our family outside the Church grave concern. But there are reasons to hope, and Father elucidates those. However, this is not the false hope of the modernists and indifferentists, who pretend that it makes no difference to God whether one exists inside the sole ark of salvation He instituted for men’s salvation. It is hope in the goodness and love of God, which is infinite, and in the power of prayer and pen ance, which exist and work outside of our narrow conceptions of time.
I pray you find this sermon as enjoyable and edifying as I did. Please pray for Father Isaac Mary Relyea and all good, faithful priests, they are under the most extreme attack and need our prayers and support.
There were other talks from The Fatima Center conference held in Houston last month that I hope to post later, including some from Father Michael Rodriguez. My esteem for The Fatima Center only continues to grow as I see the excellent work they are doing for the good of souls and the restoration of our Holy Mother the Church.
Leftism Is the Religion of Immoral People, Exhibit# 27,985,487 June 26, 2018
Posted by Tantumblogo in asshatery, Basics, cultural marxism, disaster, error, foolishness, General Catholic, horror, Immigration, manhood, persecution, Revolution, scandals, secularism, self-serving, sickness, Society, suicide, unadulterated evil.comments closed
With a knowing nod to commenter Michele Kerby, who certainly knows that there is a world of difference between a liberal with whom I disagree on various points but with whom dialogue is still possible, a la Carl Benjamin aka Sargon of Akkad, and a leftist.
As a case in point – and I know this is painting with a broad brush, but there are so many brush strokes the object is plainly obvious – Steven Crowder held one of his “Change My Mind” public discussion forums in Austin recently on the subject of whether there are more than two genders (Crowder taking the stand that, biologically and on numerous other fronts, there are not, and cannot be). He actually had a quite civil discussion with a self-described transsexual, but a hard left activist at my alma mater, the University of Texas, took such exception to the idea even being discussed that she sent out tweets calling for Crowder and his crew to be firebombed. Just to be certain she was not misunderstood, she included photos of their equipment van and repeated the call more than once.
Of course, the craven, cowardly, and self-seeking administration at UT took no action against this assault on the social fabric. But in a twist of fate, Steven Crowder was a few days later engaged in some mild mannered and humorous trolling, as he often does, at a meeting of the Texas State Democratic party convention, and guess who happened to be there, but the very woman who had incited violence. Crowder very bravely but with great tact and charity sought this woman out and confronted her. The record of that experience is below:
What adjectives would you use to describe the reaction of not just the woman encouraging violence, but the rest of those who showed up to try to shout down and shame Steven Crowder, denying him even the ability to defend himself from violent attack? Some that come to mind – childish, narcissistic, soulless, cult-like, cruel, self-serving, defensive, ignorant, ideologically possessed…….Can you think of a single virtue evidenced by this crowd? On the other side, do you know how hard it is to face that kind of group action and remain not only one’s composure, but humorous? I’ve done it a few times before, and did not remain as cool as Crowder did. He is a strong man in more ways than one.
These are not rank and file democrats. These are leaders and activists – agents of agitprop – in the Texas democrat party. They are among some of the most well connected people in the entire state party apparatus. These are not some weirdo extremists in a basement somewhere. These people have influence, and not a small amount of it.
The actions on display here speak volumes about the present state of the democrat party and the left in this country. It is little wonder major commentators on both sides of the aisle are speaking more and more openly of civil war.
I have been trying over the past several months to see things from the other side’s perspective. I read and listen to an increasing variety of sources, some of them very contrary to my established beliefs. But there are simply virtually no arguments on the other side. It is all invective, scare-mongering, grasping at straws and creation of a fantasy land in which it is the right that is pushing towards “violence” (by saying things they don’t like – note the hypocrisy, leftists act like actual incitements to violence are innocuous, while merely opposing leftist policy on logical grounds constitutes violence – only a child could formulate such a narcissistic justification) and about to bring down the nightmare of fascism on this nation. The evidence for this always remains fabricated, grossly exaggerated, mired in “what about-ism,” or just around the corner. What in reality has happened is that the Left has lost all sense and perspective and is deeply ensconced in an ideological bubble where only things that align with pre-existing notions are allowed to enter. That is why, in the face of massive electoral losses, at every level, over the past 8 years, the democrats have only been able to double-down and press ever further leftwards.
For goodness’ sake, how on earth can you even have a discussion or debate when one side – and it is always the same side, the “right,” to the extent such even exists in this country (in a traditional sense, one not infused with the parasite of enlightenment liberal thinking) – behaves like the most utterly spoiled, ill-mannered, screaming, flailing, out of control children you’ve ever seen? The utter insolence and solipsism is simply beyond the pale. Look at the face of that woman and her associates when confronted – no shame, no willingness to concede even the slightest humanity to the hated “other,” just blank stares and a quick degeneration into formulaic chants and mind-numbing rage once the realization that they were caught out and could say nothing in their defense sank in.
At the root of all this is the growing sense, among these apparatchiks and their masters, that the Left’s ideals, political, cultural, economic, etc., have been decisively rejected by this country. A poll out today showed that even after the incredible vitriol and rhetoric from the Democrats and their propaganda arm, the corporate media (or perhaps because of it), nearly 3/4 of Americans still firmly believe that illegal immigrants and their children should be deported. Should the flood of illegal Hispanic immigration be stopped or even significantly reduced, the Democrats, having turned hard left and growing ever more so as the years have passed, know they are politically finished at the national level, forever. The US public has, for all its flaws, retained enough sense to decisively reject the democrat program. Without, essentially, electing a new population to replace the “failed” incumbent one, the democrat’s political fortunes at the national level are exceedingly bleak, looking to pick up a few House seats, mostly on procedural grounds through jerrymandered redistricting in Pennsylvania and the practical collapse of the Republican party in California.
Thus this entire immigration debate is really about who shall rule, and has been for decades. But you knew that already.
Couple that sense of impotence and failure with a twisted religious fervor and levels of immorality that would make a late 18th century Parisian madame blush, and you have a recipe for true disaster. Leftists are already planning to “punish” the country for voting the wrong way if the democrats, as looks increasingly likely, get creamed in the midterms, by staging massive temper tantrums “days of rage.” Where things go from there is anybody’s guess, but my fear is that things will continue to go downhill at an ever-accelerating rate.
Where is the figure on the Left who has the sense, the presence, and the influence to call the raging, stampeding herd (30 million nutjobs can do a whale of a lot of damage) back from the brink? From what I can tell, virtually all the thought leaders and media/entertainment personalities on the Left only seem primed to go increasingly insane in their rhetoric and action. Twitter and other social media have helped create a perfect storm of ideological bubbles, instant gratification/denial, and extreme emotionalism.
A key problem is that the Democrat party has been undergoing leftist ideological purity tests for the past 15 years or more, very quickly driving all but the most committed left-wing extremists from any participation in all but the most basic party activities (like voting). Virtually all the old line conservative democrats and moderates have been driven from the party, and certainly from most all leadership positions. Goodness, when Dianne Feinstein starts to sound like the voice of reason, you know things have gotten bad.
Where does this end up? No one ever said the United States, as constituted since 1959 with the accession of Hawaii and Alaska to statehood, would last forever. I increasingly agree with Ace, that an amicable divorce along state lines is the best possible solution at this point. But even that could involve unbelievable violence, as those winding up on the wrong side of the line are “encouraged” to relocate a la the partition of the British Raj in 1948. We shall see. I see no solution to all this but prayer and penance, and more and more of both, but there are so few of us, and so many lost in the world and its false pleasures. The number one leisure-time spend in this country is pornography. May God have mercy on our nation, and its people.
Male “Birth Control,” or Let’s Totally Emasculate Men March 22, 2018
Posted by Tantumblogo in Abortion, asshatery, contraception, cultural marxism, disaster, error, family, General Catholic, horror, manhood, rank stupidity, Revolution, scandals, secularism, sickness, Society.comments closed
A purported “male birth control” pill works, researchers say. It apparently works by killing testosterone, which is supposed to reduce or prevent sperm production. There is already a sort of crisis developing regarding the plunging testosterone levels among males, especially soy latte sipping young millennials (those born between 1980-2000). But even overall male testosterone levels have been plummeting over the past several decades. One likely culprit is the mass consumption of phyto-estrogen laden soy products.
At any rate, this attempt to sterilize men en masse seems a bit on the nose, doesn’t it? Let’s let men play at birth control by denying them the hormone that most predicts and creates distinctions between men and women? Please:
One of the latest experimental candidates for a male birth control drug is a compound that would be taken much like the daily birth control pill available for women. A pilot study presented Sunday at the Endocrine Society’s annual meeting suggests that the compound—called dimethandrolone undecanoate (DMAU)—can be safe and effective in human test subjects……..
……..By experiment’s end, the volunteers who took DMAU experienced a drop in their levels of testosterone and two other hormones involved in producing sperm, which was starkest in those who took the highest dose. The study didn’t directly test their sperm, since it takes around three months for lowered hormone levels to significantly reduce someone’s sperm count. But the researchers say the hormone levels seen in the high-dose group have been shown to predict infertility in earlier studies of male contraception treatments. Conversely, the levels among all DMAU volunteers returned back to normal within a month’s time after the therapy was stopped………
……….The few side effects Page’s team observed were weight gain and lowered levels of HDL cholesterol (the “good” kind). But they feel a tweaked dose could alleviate these symptoms. Importantly, the pill didn’t seem to cause any other lasting symptoms of low testosterone. Eight men in the treatment group did report lower libido, but the effect faded away after treatment had ended. [Does anyone else severely doubt this massive hormone ingestion/modification will be side-effect free? Yeah, right]
For now, though, the as-yet-unpublished results are only a sign of hope. [How is it a sign of hope to make most men as artificially sterile as most women? The birth rate in the West is already at civilization-collapse levels. It will be the same around virtually the entire world outside parts of Africa within 10-20 years. By 2100, the world will likely experience the most severe economic, social, and cultural calamities experienced in nearly 2000 years as a result of lack of birth. But that is our human nature – we cannot stand success, comfort, and happiness, and at some level [many] seek to destroy it when we have it.] The researchers are currently in the middle of a trial meant to last for at least three months—a timeline that will let them directly test for lowered levels of sperm. And should that trial go off without a hitch, they would then test DMAU in real-life couples.
Something tells me this effort has more than a whiff of radical feminism about it – there is little practical need for male birth control at this point. It’s about making men share the birth control burden, or even more, seeing men effectively neutered and emasculated (even more than many already are).
Father Rodriguez Declares: Get to the Fatima Conference at DFW March 9-11 February 28, 2018
Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, catachesis, Dallas Diocese, family, Father Rodriguez, General Catholic, Glory, Grace, Interior Life, Latin Mass, manhood, Restoration, sanctity, Tradition, true leadership, Virtue.comments closed
I apologize to Father Rodriguez for the delay in getting this posted. It’s been one of those weeks. I am just hurriedly putting up a couple of items that have been pending for days and which it will soon be too late to post.
I asked Father Rodriguez to give an exhortation to souls to attend the upcoming Fatima Conference at the DFW airport Hyatt on March 9-11. I already know quite a few people who plan on attending, but there is room for many, many more. If you live local, you should absolutely attend, and if you are at some distance, why not take a nice Lenten retreat with the spouse and get some solid Catholic catechesis from top-rank sources?
At any rate, here is Fathers exhortation. I also add some more video updates on the conference below. Father, of course, will be giving multiple talks at the conference, along with such well known masters of Catholic catechetics as Fr. Paul MacDonald, Chris Ferrara, Michael Matt, and David Rodriguez.
My name is Fr. Michael Rodríguez, and I am a priest of the Diocese of El Paso, Texas. I want to urge all Catholics of the Dallas-Ft. Worth area, of Texas, and beyond, to make every effort to attend the upcoming Fatima Conference, “The Battle for Marriage and the Family,” on March 9-11, 2018, at the Hyatt Regency, DFW International Airport.
On Ash Wednesday, we heard God’s call to conversion through the Prophet Joel, “Be converted to me with all your heart, in fasting and in weeping and in mourning. And rend your hearts and not your garments, and turn to the Lord your God.” (2:12-13) At its core, this too is the urgent message of Our Lady of Fatima, specific for our times, the 20th and now 21st centuries!
There is a rapidly growing crisis in true Catholic Church teaching on Marriage and the Family!
There is currently an extreme crisis in the Papacy itself!
In many ways, our Catholic Church and Faith is being shaken to its very foundations!
If the one true Church of Jesus Christ is in extreme crisis, then necessarily the salvation of all souls is at risk!
How are you responding?
Ask yourself the following serious questions and reflect:
How am I turning away from sin and turning to God?
How am I being faithful to true Catholic worship and doctrine?
How am I helping others to be faithful to true Catholic worship and doctrine?
How am I witnessing to and defending true Catholic Church teaching on Marriage and the Family?
Am I heeding Our Lady’s Message at Fatima for the salvation of souls?
The upcoming Fatima Conference will help you respond to the above in a way that is faithful to God and our holy religion. Set aside some time for God and our Blessed Mother, and come!
The most holy Mother of God came to Fatima, Portugal, in 1917, to provide the magnificent light of her Son, our Savior Jesus Christ, specifically for our times of extreme spiritual darkness. Last year was the Centennial Anniversary of her Apparitions at Fatima, and still, her message goes largely unheeded by the world’s Catholics. This is a providential opportunity for you to take a first step and respond to God, Our Lady, and the Church.
Once again, please make every effort to come to the Fatima Conference, March 9-11, 2018, and invite as many other Catholics as you can!
Grrr I hit post instead of save. Here are the videos I mentioned:
Dr. Jordan Peterson Speaking in Dallas Wed May 30 2018 February 21, 2018
Posted by Tantumblogo in Basics, catachesis, Christendom, Dallas Diocese, Ecumenism, General Catholic, manhood, secularism, Society.comments closed
At 7:30 at the Majestic Theater in downtown Dallas. Tickets range from $35-$100.
Peterson remains both fascinating and annoying to me. He gave an hour long interview with former Catholic Answers regular Patrick Coffin where he talked about his approach to Christianity, and pretty much declared himself an interested and appreciative agnostic. While he has numerous brilliant takes on a huge array of subjects, and his critique of the Left is among the most powerful and well evidenced I’ve ever heard, his acceptance of evolution and his reliance on the philosophy of Jung and Piaget make him a Gnostic/modernist on the most important subjects.
Nevertheless, he is brilliant and unusually coherent at expressing difficult concepts in a way any layman can reasonably understand, and there is a huge amount of gold among the feldspar – much more gold than feldspar, generally. I think souls well formed in the Faith can partake of Peterson and sort through the good and the bad with relative ease – ignore the Jungian gnosticism, keep most of the rest.
Below is the Coffin/Peterson interview, which is important because, for the first time, it is a fairly orthodox Catholic interviewing Peterson and trying to pin him down on matters relating to the Faith. Peterson somewhat maddeningly refuses to be labeled, which I can understand to a degree (because in the current worldly context he only stands to lose if he accepts one, and he is right that many people, myself included, would love to use him as a totem upon which to hang our own particular beliefs), but I continue to be disappointed that interviewers ask such broad questions as: “Are you a Christian,” or “Do you believe in God?” These are very easily brushed off by Peterson saying “what do you mean by that?”
Here is what I want asked: “Do you, or can you, accept the Doctrine of the Faith as defined in the Apostolic, Nicene, and Athanasian Creeds?” “Have you ever read Pascendi Dominici Gregis and Quanta Cura, and could you faithfully swear the Oath Against Modernism?” The creeds are extremely specific and were deliberately contrived to avoid obfuscation. But no one, that I know of, has ever asked such questions.
When Peterson below asserts: “How do you know that you are a ‘true follower’ of Christ, or properly understand what it means to be Christian,” the Catholic can respond with infinite confidence: because Christ created a Church He promised would define the Faith for all time, that Church has 637 defined dogmas, the acceptance and practice of which makes me at least an observant follower of God’s Law for us, if not a “good Christian.”
As to whether Coffin is right, that Peterson is on his way to becoming Catholic, that would be fantastic, but I am not quite so confident. For all his good, Peterson’s “god” remains the false doctrine of evolution – he will have an exceedingly difficult time becoming a Christian so long as that remains. At any rate, he also seems much more drawn to Eastern Orthodoxy than Catholicism.
BTW, Peterson will also be speaking in Austin on May 31 as part of a 12 city tour.
Lack of Belief in Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus at Root of Crisis in Church November 14, 2017
Posted by Tantumblogo in awesomeness, Basics, catachesis, Christendom, Ecumenism, fightback, General Catholic, Latin Mass, manhood, Restoration, Spiritual Warfare, Tradition, true leadership, Virtue.comments closed
You either believe visible communion/right membership in the Church is vital, even required, for salvation, or you don’t. 20th century quasi-modernist formulations aside, both the vast majority of theologians/bishops/fathers/doctors and the vast majority of the laity over numerous centuries took the doctrinal declaration of “no salvation outside the Church” quite literally. This was the understanding that fired the superhuman efforts at evangelization (even, my oh my, proselytization) the Church undertook for many long centuries, converting most of the world, at least in part. This was the understanding that led to thousands upon thousands of martyrdoms, where Catholics refused to burn a pinch of incense to Caesar or partake in an English protestant worship service with its barren table altar and iconoclastic environment (rather like most parishes built since 1950).
Extra ecclesiam nulla salus, or rejection thereof, is one of those doctrines at the very core of the crisis in the Church. In many respects the so-called Feeneyites were right, they were simply both a bit extreme, and a bit late, perhaps. Had they come to the fore in 1890 instead of 1945, they might have elicited much more of a yawn than the ecclesiastical hammer blows a hierarchy (especially an American hierarchy) seeking an accommodation with protestantism at any cost delivered.
A priest of the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest delivers a solid sermon on this vital matter below. He is quite correct in noting the foundational role rejection of EENS has played in the past 60 odd years of Church auto-demolition:
The sermon might be more review for many readers of this nutty blog, but if you’re anything like me, it’s good to hear reminders of stuff you “already” know from time to time. Otherwise, I tend to lose them.
AND, I think this is a topic that can’t get enough coverage. Even among traditional Catholic priest, Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus seems to be viewed as a bit of a minefield. Some Fraternity priests give real clear catechesis on this subject, but others wouldn’t touch it with a cane pole. So I think it merits coverage on that point, as well.