Canadian Gov’t to Steal Children from Home if Parent’s Don’t “Accept” Their “Gender Identity”

Whatever those loaded terms mean.

If you like your kids, you can keep your kids, provided you do and think and say everything the almighty state commands at every instant.  And no, this is not much of an exaggeration, with Ontario – whose laws almost always wind up being put into place at the national level in the People’s Republic of Canadia – now passing a law that says children may be removed from a home if parents do not “accept” – and who gets to decide the terms of that acceptance?!? – their child’s new “gender identity,” no matter how flighty, bizarre, peer-pressure-induced, or destructive it may be:

A Canadian province has passed a law that gives rights to the government to take away children from families that don’t accept their kid’s chosen “gender identity” or “gender expression”.

The Supporting Children, Youth and Families Act of 2017, also know as Bill 89, was passed in Ontario by a vote of 63 to 23, The Christian Times reported. [Do note the Orwellian language.  Yes, they support families by ripping them apart, the better to allow the state to make permanent devotees of the religion of sexular paganism starting at age 3.]

The law, which replaces old laws governing child protection, foster care and adoption services, instructs all child services and judges, to take into consideration a child’s “race, ancestry, place of origin, color, ethnic origin, citizenship, family diversity, disability, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression.” [This is ugly in so many respects. This balkanization into post-modern eternally warring aggrieved groups is the work of satan.  Also note the overtones of anti-white racialism in all this.]

Minister of Child and Family Services Michael Coteau, who introduced the bill, said “I would consider that a form of abuse, when a child identifies one way and a caregiver is saying no, you need to do this differently.” [Once again the Orwellian language.  Not a parent, not a person whose very soul is intimately wrapped up in the fate of the child they helped create, but a “caregiver.”]

“If it’s abuse, and if it’s within the definition, a child can be removed from that environment and placed into protection where the abuse stops.” [And this will never be abused for political ends, or see children’s (and parent’s) lives permanently up-ended after they fall prey to some demonic online hellhole like Tumblr.]

The old law used to allow parents to “direct the child’s education and religious upbringing.” The new bill, however, amends such rights of the parents. [Right.  But it also will never, ever be applied to muslims, only to Christians.  Also, shame on you Canada for your British-inspired and damnable conception of rights, believing it is up to the state to hand out to parents (and all other citizens) whatever the state deigns to give, rather than being the God-given right of every soul born on this earth to raise their children to the best of their ability and in line with their own conscience.  It is thus Canada has no equivalent to the US First or Second Amendments.]

It now emphasizes a child’s “identity and allows parents only to “direct the child or young person’s education and upbringing, in accordance with the child’s or young person’s creed, community identity and cultural identity.” [So if white parents adopt a black child they have to teach him ebonics?  If they adopt a child of muslim parents (however unlikely that may be) they have to raise him as a muzzie?]

Ontario children and youth advocate Irwin Elman celebrated the bill and said it signals a “paradigm shift” and creates a “child-centered system of service” with “the commitment to anti-racism and children’s rights.” [Let me rephrase: “Now we leftists get access to thousands of kids so young they’ll be ours forever.”]

Jack Fonseca, a political strategist for Campaign Life Coalition, meanwhile, criticized the new law.

I’d do more than criticize, I’d be profoundly freaked out and looking for somewhere to emigrate to, but it’s rapidly becoming clear there are few places left in the former West/Christendom that aren’t on an identical path. Colombia’s been fairly stable for a while now.  Cartageña’s supposed to be nice. How about Panama?  Every day is 12 hours long, no more, no less!

Tragically, what happens in Canada, doesn’t stay in Canada.  It tends to show up here about 20-30 years later, or whenever the electorate gives the Leftist party the presidency.